Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Challenge-Based Learning Through Making

Representing STEM Crosscutting Concepts Through Designing and Making in Middle School Engineering

Bibliographic Data

ID22044705
AuthorsJuan Torralba (0009-0004-7268-6934, Institute for the Future), Jorge Membrillo‐Hernández (0000-0001-7650-8116, Institute for the Future)
Year2025
Volume15
Issue10
Pages1292
Publication date2025-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducation Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/educsci15101292
OpenAlexW4414707009
LanguageEN
References cited35

Proportional reasoning is a crosscutting concept identified as necessary for student success in upper-level mathematics as well as science, technology, and engineering. Research on middle-grade mathematics learning shows that students tend to develop stronger understandings of mathematical concepts when they learn through constructionist real-world projects that are relevant and meaningful to them. In this qualitative exploratory research study, we developed and implemented a Challenge-Based Learning through Making project for a middle school engineering class to investigate how students demonstrate their understanding of proportional reasoning through designing and making physical and digital artifacts, mentored by industry experts, and within the context of a school makerspace. Our findings showed that students accurately represented their understanding of proportionality through their digital artifacts more than any other modality available, contrasting previous findings in the relevant literature. Findings regarding the integration of professional technology for digital 3D modeling, mentorship of industry experts, and the prevalence of mathematical estimation in digital modeling provide avenues for further research vis-a-vis the role of expert mentorship in middle school STEM design challenges and mathematical estimation in spatial reasoning for design. Implications for the practice and the field of STEM learning are discussed

Design-based research · Engineering education · Exploratory research · Mentorship · Project-Based Learning · Qualitative research · Strict constructionism · Biomedical and Engineering Education · Mechatronics Education and Applications · Teaching and Learning Programming

  • The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences

    Open Access•R Keith Sawyer•Cambridge Handbook of the…•2014

  • The Maker Movement in Education

    Erica Rosenfeld Halverson, Kyoko Sheridan et al.•Harvard Educational Review•2014

  • Learning in the Making

    Kyoko Sheridan, Kimberly Sheridan et al.•Harvard Educational Review•2014

  • The Maker Movement

    Dale Dougherty•Innovations•2012

  • Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects

    Andrew K Shenton•Education for Information•2004

  • Makerspaces and Contributions to Entrepreneurship

    Open Access•Eric Joseph Van Holm•Procedia - Social and Behavioral…•2015

  • The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences

    Open Access•R Keith Sawyer•Cambridge Handbook of the…•2005

  • Systematic Review

    Open Access•Marisol Galdames-Calderón, Anni Stavnskær Pedersen et al.•Education Sciences•2024

  • Effectiveness of Challenge-Based Learning in Undergraduate Engineering Programs from Competencies and Gender Perspectives

    Open Access•Gilberto Huesca, Adriana Rodríguez-Rosales et al.•Education Sciences•2024

  • Learning through Making and Maker Education

    Open Access•Yu‐Chang Hsu, Sally Baldwin et al.•TechTrends•2017

  • Professional Development Considerations for Makerspace Leaders, Part One

    Open Access•Kevin Oliver•TechTrends•2016

  • Learning through Making

    Open Access•Torrey Trust, Robert W Maloy et al.•TechTrends•2017

  • Where do we go from here? Innovative technologies and heritage engagement with the MakerBus

    Open Access•Mary E Compton, Kim Martins et al.•Digital Applications in…•2017

  • Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis

    Open Access•Hsiu-Fang Hsieh, Sarah E Shannon•Qualitative Health Research•2005

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae