Perceptions of Sustainability Integration in Higher Education
Evidence from a Faculty–Student Comparative Mixed-Methods Analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22045141 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Karen Stephany Córdova-Vera (0000-0001-7986-0430, Universidad Israel, corresponding author), Renato M Toasa (0000-0002-2138-300X, Universidad Israel, corresponding author), Miguel Aizaga (0000-0002-4492-1181, Universidad Israel), María Carmen Colmenárez (0009-0002-7032-9760, Universidad Israel) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 596 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-08 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Education Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/educsci16040596 |
| OpenAlex | W7151874712 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 18 |
Integrating sustainability into higher education is a strategic priority of the 2030 Agenda, although its effective implementation remains uneven and understudied from internal institution comparative perspectives. This study analyzes the perceptions of faculty and students regarding the integration of sustainability at a higher education institution in Ecuador, using a convergent–complementary mixed-methods design that triangulates descriptive quantitative analysis and qualitative thematic content analysis. The quantitative component included 597 students and 88 faculty members, who responded to structured questionnaires of 15 items organized into five dimensions: curriculum and teaching, participation and engagement, resources and institutional support, impact and expectations, and vision for the future. The qualitative component was based on semi-structured interviews analyzed using thematic coding. The results show a generally favorable perception in both groups (Student Perception Index = 2.35; Faculty Perception Index = 2.23), with greater consensus in the impact and expectations dimension and significant gaps in resources and institutional support. Qualitative analysis revealed distinct relational models: faculty members articulate sustainability through professional responsibility and curriculum management, while students construct it from fragmented experiences and extra-university references. Triangulation of both components reveals a duality between solid normative legitimation and incipient structural institutionalization. These findings contribute to the debate on sustainable transition processes in Latin American universities and provide comparative empirical evidence for the design of institutional policies in emerging contexts
Content analysis · Curriculum · Higher education · Institution · Normative · Perception · Qualitative research · Sustainability · Thematic analysis · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Higher Education and Sustainability · Sustainability in Higher Education
Declarations for sustainability in higher education
Sustainability in higher education in the context of the UN Desd
Sustainable universities – a study of critical success factors for participatory approaches
The future we want
Academic staff development as a catalyst for curriculum change towards education for sustainable development
A typology of reviews
The Perception of Undergraduate Students From Different Educational Systems on Sustainability
The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd edition)
Key competencies in sustainability in higher education—toward an agreed-upon reference framework
Enhancing the contribution of higher education institutions to sustainable development research
Adopting sustainability competence‐based education in academic disciplines
Using thematic analysis in psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|