Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Preservice Biology Teachers’ Scientific Reasoning Skills and Beliefs about Nature of Science

How Do They Develop and Is There a Mutual Relationship during the Development

Bibliographic Data

ID22045291
AuthorsDaniela Mahler (0000-0003-0921-1093, Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, corresponding author), Denise Bock (0000-0002-8116-1628, Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education), Till Bruckermann (0000-0002-8789-8276, Leibniz University Hannover, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume11
Issue9
Pages558
Publication date2021-09-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducation Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/educsci11090558
OpenAlexW3200393203
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited53

Scientific reasoning (SR) skills and nature of science (NOS) beliefs represent important characteristics of biology teachers’ professional competence. In particular, teacher education at university is formative for the professionalization of future teachers and is thus the focus of the current study. Our study aimed to examine the development of SR skills and NOS beliefs and their mutual relationship during teacher education. We applied paper-and-pencil tests to measure SR skills and NOS beliefs of 299 preservice biology teachers from 25 universities in Germany. The results of linear mixed models and planned comparisons revealed that both SR skills and NOS beliefs develop over the course of the study. Nevertheless, the development of SR skills and multiple aspects of NOS beliefs proceeds in different trajectories. Cross-lagged models showed a complex picture concerning the mutual relationship between SR skills and NOS beliefs during their development (both positive and negative). The current study contributes to the existing research because it is based on longitudinal data and allows—in contrast to cross-sectional research—conclusions about the development of SR skills and NOS beliefs

Formative assessment · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Professionalization · Science education · Social science · Sociology · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy · Social Psychology

  • Analysis of Data-Based Scientific Reasoning from a Product-Based and a Process-Based Perspective

    Open Access•Sabine Meister, Annette Upmeier zu Belzen•Education Sciences•2021

  • Baseline Views of Preservice Physics Teachers on Inquiry-Based Approaches and Their Connection with Nature of Science Conceptions

    Open Access•Gregorio Jiménez Valverde, Gregorio Jiménez-Valverde et al.•Education Sciences•2026

  • Professional Knowledge and Self-Efficacy Expectations of Pre-Service Teachers Regarding Scientific Reasoning and Diagnostics

    Open Access•Dagmar Hilfert-Rüppell, Monique Meier et al.•Education Sciences•2021

  • Students’ gender differences and scientific inquiry competencies in technical education and training institutions

    Labani Kanyonga, Eugenia Kafanabo et al.•International Journal of Science…•2026

  • Evaluation of the effect of in-class activity-based practices on scientific reasoning skills of pre-service science teachers

    Serpil Kara, Oktay Aslan•International Journal of Science…•2024

  • Exploring Nature of Science Understanding, Science Self-efficacy and Their Relationships Among Secondary School Pre-service Science Teachers in Ethiopia

    Open Access•Gidele Gito Gizaw, Solomon Sorsa Sota et al.•Science & Education•2025

  • Opening the Black Box of Scientific Practices

    Open Access•Katharina Düsing, Vanessa van den Bogaert et al.•Science & Education•2026

  • Changing perspectives

    Open Access•Katharina Asbury, Broder Carstensen et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2025

  • Theorien in der naturwissenschaftsdidaktischen Forschung

    Open Access•Dirk Krüger, Ilka Parchmann et al.•Theorien in der naturwissenschaftsd…•2018

  • Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research

    Robert Rosenthal•Meta-Analytic Procedures for…•1991

  • Classroom Discourse and the Space of Learning

    Ference Marton, Amy B M Tsui et al.•Classroom Discourse and the Space…•2004

  • Searching for a common ground – A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities

    Open Access•Silke Rönnebeck, Sascha Bernholt et al.•Studies in Science Education•2016

  • Emmeans

    Russell V Lenth, Julia Piaskowski•CRAN: Contributed Packages•2017

  • Two Views About Explicitly Teaching Nature of Science

    Open Access•Richard A Duschl, Richard E Grandy et al.•Science & Education•2013

  • The “general aspects” conceptualization as a pragmatic and effective means to introducing students to nature of science

    Open Access•Kostas Kampourakis•Journal of Research in Science…•2016

  • Styles of Scientific Reasoning: A Cultural Rationale for Science Education?

    Open Access•Vanessa Kind, PER KIND et al.•Science Education•2017

  • Learning Science, Learning about Science, Doing Science

    Derek Hodson•International Journal of Science…•2014

  • Weighted Likelihood Estimation of Ability in Item Response Theory

    Open Access•Thomas A Warm•Psychometrika•1989

  • A Review of Empirical Literature on Inquiry Professional Development

    Daniel K Capps, Barbara A Crawford et al.•Journal of Science Teacher…•2012

  • Effectsize

    Open Access•Mattan Ben-Shachar, Daniel Lüdecke et al.•Journal of Open Source Software•2020

  • Views of nature of science questionnaire

    Open Access•Norm G Lederman, Fouad Abd‐el‐khalick et al.•Journal of Research in Science…•2002

  • Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry‐oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science

    Open Access•Rola Khishfe, Fouad Abd‐el‐khalick•Journal of Research in Science…•2002

  • Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

    Open Access•David M Bates, Douglas Bates et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2015

  • A general and simple method for obtaining R 2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models

    Open Access•Shinichi Nakagawa, Holger Schielzeth et al.•Methods in Ecology and Evolution•2013

  • Assessing scientific reasoning competencies of pre-service science teachers

    Moritz Krell, Sabrina Mathesius et al.•International Journal of Science…•2020

  • Scientific reasoning and views on the nature of scientific inquiry

    Marco Reith, Andreas Nehring•International Journal of Science…•2020

  • Those Who Understand

    Open Access•Lee S Shulman•Educational Researcher•1986

  • Scientific Reasoning Competencies

    Open Access•Samia Khan, Moritz Krell•Canadian Journal of Science…•2019

  • Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress

    Open Access•Jürgen Baumert, M Kunter et al.•American Educational Research…•2009

Unique citing works8
Citations per year1,6
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae