Research-Informed Design Principles in the Development of Professional Competency Frameworks
A Systematic Review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22045860 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cep Ubad Abdullah (0000-0002-6759-9543, The University of Sydney, corresponding author), Sherly Rahmawati (0000-0002-6766-6769, Indonesia University of Education), Wayne Cotton (0000-0002-8581-6679, The University of Sydney), Louisa R Peralta (0000-0002-6205-8676, The University of Sydney) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 725 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Education Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/educsci16050725 |
| OpenAlex | W7160093665 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 71 |
Professional competency frameworks are important for aligning educational outcomes with workforce needs. While multiple frameworks exist across sectors, the underlying research-informed design principles guiding their development remain fragmented. This systematic review synthesises methodological approaches and proposes research-informed design principles used in developing professional competency frameworks across diverse professions, identifying common patterns and informing future framework design. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 and SWiM guidelines. Searches across major academic databases yielded 3656 records. After screening, 47 studies met inclusion criteria. Data extraction focused on methodological processes and development activities. Thematic analysis was used to generate a set of design principles: (1) Foundational Inquiry and Evidence Gathering; (2) Consensus-Building and Collaborative Validation; and (3) Framework Development and Iterative Refinement. The development of competency frameworks is inherently cyclical, interdisciplinary, and iterative, blending empirical inquiry with collaborative validation. The identified research-informed design principles offer a transferable blueprint applicable across sectors, from healthcare to education and other industries. Thus, it is strongly recommended that future studies use these initial research-informed design principles to inform competency development. The systematic review has been registered with Open Science Framework (OSF)
Blueprint · Design elements and principles · Professional development · Systematic review · Thematic analysis · Workforce · Workforce development · Competency Development and Evaluation · Innovations in Medical Education · Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool
Competency-based medical education
Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar
The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence
Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews
The PRISMA 2020 statement
Defining competencies in curriculum and instruction and developing a new competency model
Theoretical Frameworks for Mathematics Teacher’s Professional Development with Technology
Using the Principles from Community of Practice
The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers
An International Competency Framework for High-Quality Workforce Development in Integrated Care (IC)
Using thematic analysis in psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |