AI-Supported Pedagogical Supervision
A Theory-Building Framework for Understanding Feedback, Cognitive Processing, Reflective Practice and Pedagogical Decision-Making
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22046045 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rui Silva (0000-0002-0283-9462, School of Science and Technology (ECT), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal), Rui Manuel Silva (0009-0006-5883-3381, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 959 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-17 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Education Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/educsci16060959 |
| OpenAlex | W7165043213 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 25 |
The increasing integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) into teacher education and pedagogical supervision requires explanatory frameworks capable of clarifying how AI-generated feedback may support professional learning processes. Existing research has predominantly focused on technological adoption, implementation challenges, and user perceptions, while comparatively limited attention has been devoted to the cognitive and reflective mechanisms involved in AI-supported pedagogical supervision. In response to this gap, this article proposes a theory-building conceptual framework explaining how AI-supported pedagogical supervision may influence pedagogical decision-making through sequential mechanisms involving feedback quality, cognitive processing, and reflective practice. Drawing on feedback theory, Cognitive Load Theory, reflective practice literature, and distributed cognition perspectives, the proposed framework conceptualises AI not as a direct instructional agent, but as a support system embedded within professional pedagogical reasoning processes. To facilitate future empirical investigation, the article proposes a validation framework based on covariance-based Structural Equation Modelling (CB-SEM). This methodological specification is intended solely as a research agenda for subsequent studies and does not constitute empirical testing of the model. As a conceptual contribution, the article advances a theoretically integrated explanation of how AI-generated feedback may influence professional learning processes. By articulating feedback quality, cognitive processing, reflective practice, and pedagogical decision-making within a coherent framework, it offers a foundation for future empirical research and theory development in AI-supported pedagogical supervision
Cognition · Cognitive Load · Conceptual framework · Empirical evidence · Empirical research · Generative grammar · Professional development · Reflective Practice · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Cognitive Load Theory
Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R
Cross-Sectional versus Longitudinal Survey Research
Sample Size Justification
Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education
Likert Scale
Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence
Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?
Opinion Paper
Artificial intelligence in higher education
Common method biases in behavioral research
Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models
ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society
Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling
Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators
Reflection in teacher education
The Power of Feedback
| Highly cited | No |
|---|