Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

AI-Supported Pedagogical Supervision

A Theory-Building Framework for Understanding Feedback, Cognitive Processing, Reflective Practice and Pedagogical Decision-Making

Bibliographic Data

ID22046045
AuthorsRui Silva (0000-0002-0283-9462, School of Science and Technology (ECT), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal), Rui Manuel Silva (0009-0006-5883-3381, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume16
Issue6
Pages959
Publication date2026-06-17
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducation Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/educsci16060959
OpenAlexW7165043213
LanguageEN
References cited25

The increasing integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) into teacher education and pedagogical supervision requires explanatory frameworks capable of clarifying how AI-generated feedback may support professional learning processes. Existing research has predominantly focused on technological adoption, implementation challenges, and user perceptions, while comparatively limited attention has been devoted to the cognitive and reflective mechanisms involved in AI-supported pedagogical supervision. In response to this gap, this article proposes a theory-building conceptual framework explaining how AI-supported pedagogical supervision may influence pedagogical decision-making through sequential mechanisms involving feedback quality, cognitive processing, and reflective practice. Drawing on feedback theory, Cognitive Load Theory, reflective practice literature, and distributed cognition perspectives, the proposed framework conceptualises AI not as a direct instructional agent, but as a support system embedded within professional pedagogical reasoning processes. To facilitate future empirical investigation, the article proposes a validation framework based on covariance-based Structural Equation Modelling (CB-SEM). This methodological specification is intended solely as a research agenda for subsequent studies and does not constitute empirical testing of the model. As a conceptual contribution, the article advances a theoretically integrated explanation of how AI-generated feedback may influence professional learning processes. By articulating feedback quality, cognitive processing, reflective practice, and pedagogical decision-making within a coherent framework, it offers a foundation for future empirical research and theory development in AI-supported pedagogical supervision

Cognition · Cognitive Load · Conceptual framework · Empirical evidence · Empirical research · Generative grammar · Professional development · Reflective Practice · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies

  • Cognitive Load Theory

    Open Access•Alexander Renkl, John Sweller et al.•Cognitive Load Theory•2011

  • Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R

    Open Access•Joseph F Hair, G Tomas M Hult et al.•Partial Least Squares Structural…•2021

  • Cross-Sectional versus Longitudinal Survey Research

    Open Access•Aric Rindfleisch, Alan J Malter et al.•Journal of Marketing Research•2008

  • Sample Size Justification

    Open Access•Daniël Lakens, Don Van Ravenzwaaij•Collabra•2022

  • Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education

    Open Access•Ido Roll, Ruth Wylie•International Journal of…•2016

  • Likert Scale

    Ankur Joshi, Saket Kale et al.•British Journal of Applied…•2015

  • Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence

    Ella Glikson, Anita Williams Woolley•Academy of Management Annals•2020

  • Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?

    Open Access•Wan Ng•Computers & Education•2012

  • Opinion Paper

    Open Access•Yogesh K Dwivedi, Nir Kshetri et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • Artificial intelligence in higher education

    Open Access•Helen Crompton, Diane Burke•International Journal of…•2023

  • Common method biases in behavioral research

    Philip M Podsakoff, Scott B Mackenzie et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2003

  • Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models

    Open Access•Kristopher J Preacher, Andrew F Hayes•Behavior Research Methods•2008

  • ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education

    Open Access•Enkelejda Kasneci, Kathrin Sessler et al.•Learning and Individual Differences•2023

  • AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society

    Open Access•Luciano Floridi, Josh Cowls et al.•Minds and Machines•2018

  • Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling

    Open Access•Ilker Etikan•American Journal of Theoretical…•2016

  • Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators

    Open Access•Olaf Zawacki-Richter, Victoria I Marín et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • Reflection in teacher education

    Open Access•Neville Hatton, David Smith et al.•Teaching and Teacher Education•1995

  • The Power of Feedback

    Open Access•John Hattie, Helen Timperley•Review of Educational Research•2007

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae