Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Beyond Language Gains

A Meta-Analysis of Non-Linguistic Outcomes of ChatGPT-Integrated English Instruction in South Korea

Bibliographic Data

ID22046885
AuthorsJe-Young Lee (0000-0002-1731-4423, Jeonju University, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume16
Issue3
Pages481
Publication date2026-03-20
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducation Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/educsci16030481
OpenAlexW7139129987
LanguageEN
References cited39

This meta-analysis investigates the outcomes associated with ChatGPT-integrated English instruction on non-linguistic outcomes in South Korea. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, 22 experimental studies (k = 26, N = 1303) were synthesized using a random-effects model, which revealed a significant medium overall effect size (g = 0.55). Subgroup analyses showed medium-to-large effects in Affective (g = 0.67) and AI Literacy (g = 0.59) domains, but a small effect on Cognitive/Metacognitive outcomes (g = 0.17). Moderator analyses (e.g., educational level, duration) yielded no significant differences, suggesting a meaningful overall trend across contexts. However, the descriptive disparity between affective gains and cognitive growth indicates an ‘Affective–Cognitive Gap.’ Findings suggest that while ChatGPT is associated with a reduction in psychological barriers—partly by reducing mental effort—it may lead to ‘cognitive offloading’ without intentional pedagogical scaffolding. The study concludes that mere tool adoption is insufficient. To prevent a ‘plateau effect’ after the initial novelty wears off, instruction must evolve from passive use to ‘agentic engagement’ through structured metacognitive routines. These results emphasize the necessity of teacher-mediated integration to repurpose AI-afforded efficiency toward higher-order evaluative and critical thinking tasks

Cognition · Descriptive statistics · English as a second language · Literacy · Medium of instruction · Metacognition · Moderation · Novelty · AI in Service Interactions · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Online Learning and Analytics

  • Introduction to Meta‐Analysis

    Open Access•Michael Borenstein, Larry V Hedges et al.•Introduction to Meta-Analysis•2021

  • Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis

    Harris Cooper•Research Synthesis and…•2017

  • Languages Are Still a Major Barrier to Global Science

    Open Access•Tetsuya Amano, Juan P González-Varo et al.•PLOS Biology•2016

  • Exploring AI-mediated informal digital learning of English (AI-Idle)

    Open Access•Guangxiang Liu, Ron Darvin et al.•Computer Assisted Language Learning•2025

  • The Effect of English-Language Restriction on Systematic Review-Based Meta-Analyses

    Open Access•Andra Morrison, Julie Polisena et al.•International Journal of…•2012

  • ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning

    Open Access•Lucas Kohnke, Benjamin Luke Moorhouse et al.•RELC Journal•2023

  • Developing AI Literacy for Primary and Middle School Teachers in China

    Open Access•Leilei Zhao, Xiaofan Wu et al.•Sustainability•2022

  • Trim and Fill

    Open Access•Sue Duval, Richard Tweedie et al.•Biometrics•2000

  • Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

    Open Access•Matthias Egger, Gregory D Smith et al.•BMJ•1997

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•BMJ•2021

  • Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package

    Open Access•Wolfgang Viechtbauer•Journal of Statistical Software•2010

  • Retracted Article

    Open Access•Jin Wang, Wenxiang Fan•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature

    Open Access•Chung Kwan Lo•Education Sciences•2023

  • Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies

    Open Access•Ruiqi Deng, Maoli Jiang et al.•Computers & Education•2025

  • A meta-analysis of the reliability of second language reading comprehension assessment tools

    Open Access•Huijun Zhao, Vahid Aryadoust•Studies in Second Language…•2025

  • Individual differences in second language acquisition

    Open Access•Zoltán Dörnyei•AILA Review•2006

  • How Big Is "Big"? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research

    Open Access•Luke Plonsky, Frederick L Oswald•Language Learning•2014

  • Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner

    Barry J Zimmerman•Theory Into Practice•2002

  • The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results

    Robert Rosenthal•Psychological Bulletin•1979

  • A Study on the Efficacy of ChatGPT-4 in Enhancing Students' English Communication Skills

    Open Access•Ying Wang•SAGE Open•2025

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae