Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

From Prompt to Polished

Exploring Student–Chatbot Interactions for Academic Writing Assistance

Bibliographic Data

ID22049335
AuthorsMaya Usher (0000-0002-8895-5375, Holon Institute of Technology, corresponding author), Meital Amzalag (0000-0001-5197-5172, Holon Institute of Technology)
Year2025
Volume15
Issue3
Pages329
Publication date2025-03-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducation Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/educsci15030329
OpenAlexW4408170563
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited42

The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in higher education has opened new avenues for enhancing academic writing through student–chatbot interactions. While initial research has explored this potential, deeper insights into the nature of these interactions are needed. This study characterizes graduate students’ interactions with AI chatbots for academic writing, focusing on the types of assistance they sought and their communication style and tone patterns. To achieve this, individual online sessions were conducted with 43 graduate students, and their chatbot interactions were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative methods. The analysis identified seven distinct types of assistance sought by students. The most frequent requests involved content generation and expansion, followed by source integration and verification, and then concept clarification and definitions. Students also sought chatbot support for writing consultation, text refinement and formatting, and, less frequently, rephrasing and modifying content and translation assistance. The most frequent communication style was “requesting,” marked by direct appeals for assistance, followed by “questioning” and “declarative” styles. In terms of communication tone, “neutral” and “praising” appeals dominated the interactions, reflecting engagement and appreciation for chatbot responses, while “reprimanding” tones were relatively low. These findings highlight the need for tailored chatbot interventions that encourage students to seek AI assistance for a broader and more in-depth range of writing tasks

Academic writing · Chatbot · Mathematics education · Multimedia · World Wide Web · AI in Service Interactions · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Computer Science · Online Learning and Analytics · Psychology

  • Mapping student-AI interaction dynamics in multi-agent learning environments

    Open Access•Zhanxin Hao, Jie Cao et al.•Computers & Education•2026

  • Artificial intelligence in academic writing

    Open Access•Prosenjeet Ghosh, P L Ghosh et al.•Sustainable Futures•2026

  • How do pedagogical approaches affect the impact of chatbots on learning performance? A meta-analysis and research synthesis

    Open Access•Qian Zhang, Nan Zhang et al.•Educational Research Review•2026

  • Comparative analysis of high and low performers’ use of generative AI in EFL academic writing

    Yao Lu, Chengyuan Jia•Computer Assisted Language Learning•2026

  • Using chatbot in education – A systematic review and research agenda

    Open Access•Tai Ming Wut, Tai-ming Wut et al.•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2026

  • Does the Thesis Still Make Sense? A Comparative Analysis of Scientific Essays Generated by Humans and Generative Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Mátyás Turós, Klára Soltész-Várhelyi et al.•Education Sciences•2026

  • Blending Generative AI and Instructor-Led Learning

    Open Access•Dizza Beimel, Meital Amzalag et al.•Education Sciences•2025

  • Killing Educators’ Nightmare—Opportunities and Challenges When Using GenAI in Marking an Essay Assignment

    Open Access•Tai Ming Wut, Elaine Ah-heung Chan et al.•Education Sciences•2026

  • A grounded theory approach to profiling student competencies in GAI-based teaching and learning environments

    Fateme Jafari, Ahmad Keykha et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2026

  • Who grades best? Comparing ChatGPT, peer, and instructor evaluations across varying levels of student project quality

    Open Access•Maya Usher, Montathar Faraon•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2025

  • Generative AI vs. instructor vs. peer assessments

    Open Access•Maya Usher•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2025

  • Academic socialisation through AI and peer feedback in doctoral writing

    Open Access•Baraa Khuder, Maria Cervin-Ellqvist et al.•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2026

  • The impact of a virtual teaching assistant (chatbot) on students' learning in Ghanaian higher education

    Open Access•Harry Barton Essel, Dimitrios Vlachopoulos et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students

    Open Access•Muhammad Abbas, Farooq Ahmed Jam et al.•International Journal of…•2024

  • Students’ voices on generative AI

    Open Access•Cecilia K Y Chan, Wenjie Hu•International Journal of…•2023

  • A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education

    Open Access•Michael Bond, Hassan Khosravi et al.•International Journal of…•2024

  • Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom

    Open Access•Yoshija Walter•International Journal of…•2024

  • Empowering educators to be AI-ready

    Open Access•Rose Luckin, Mutlu Cukurova et al.•Computers and Education:…•2022

  • How AI can be a force for good

    Open Access•Mariarosaria Taddeo, Luciano Floridi•Science•2018

  • Exploring Students’ Perceptions of ChatGPT

    Open Access•Abdulhadi Shoufan•IEEE Access•2023

  • Using chatbots to support student goal setting and social presence in fully online activities

    Open Access•Khe Foon Hew, Weijiao Huang et al.•Journal of Computing in Higher…•2023

  • Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education

    Open Access•Sukhpal Singh Gill, Minxian Xu et al.•Internet of Things and…•2024

  • What if the devil is my guardian angel

    Open Access•Ahmed Tlili, Boulus Shehata et al.•Smart Learning Environments•2023

  • Role of AI chatbots in education

    Open Access•Lasha Labadze, Maya Grigolia et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • Not quite eye to A.I.

    Open Access•Alex Barrett, Austin Pack•International Journal of…•2023

  • ChatGPT in education

    Open Access•Reza Hadi Mogavi, Chao Deng et al.•Computers in Human Behavior…•2024

  • Chatbot learning partners

    Open Access•Luke K Fryer, Kaori Nakao et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2019

  • ChatGPT and the digitisation of writing

    Open Access•Xin Zhao, Aimee Meredith Cox et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Academic Writing Challenges and Supports

    Open Access•Shikha Gupta, Atul Jaiswal et al.•Frontiers in Education•2022

  • Strategies for Integrating Generative AI into Higher Education

    Open Access•Gila Kurtz, Meital Amzalag et al.•Education Sciences•2024

  • Impacts of an AI-based chabot on college students’ after-class review, academic performance, self-efficacy, learning attitude, and motivation

    Open Access•Yen-Fen Lee, Gwo-Jen Hwang et al.•Educational Technology Research…•2022

  • Chatbots for learning

    Open Access•Pavel Smutny, Petra Schreiberova•Computers & Education•2020

  • Peer assessment in a project-based engineering course

    Maya Usher, Miri Barak•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2018

  • Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators

    Open Access•Olaf Zawacki-Richter, Victoria I Marín et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • ChatGPT and its ethical implications for STEM research and higher education

    Open Access•Benjamin H Nam, Qingshun Bai•International Journal of STEM…•2023

  • Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis

    Open Access•Hsiu-Fang Hsieh, Sarah E Shannon•Qualitative Health Research•2005

  • Human-AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing

    Open Access•Andy Nguyen, Yvonne Hong et al.•Studies in Higher Education•2024

Unique citing works12
Citations per year12
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae