From Prompt to Polished
Exploring Student–Chatbot Interactions for Academic Writing Assistance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22049335 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Maya Usher (0000-0002-8895-5375, Holon Institute of Technology, corresponding author), Meital Amzalag (0000-0001-5197-5172, Holon Institute of Technology) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 329 |
| Publication date | 2025-03-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Education Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/educsci15030329 |
| OpenAlex | W4408170563 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 42 |
The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in higher education has opened new avenues for enhancing academic writing through student–chatbot interactions. While initial research has explored this potential, deeper insights into the nature of these interactions are needed. This study characterizes graduate students’ interactions with AI chatbots for academic writing, focusing on the types of assistance they sought and their communication style and tone patterns. To achieve this, individual online sessions were conducted with 43 graduate students, and their chatbot interactions were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative methods. The analysis identified seven distinct types of assistance sought by students. The most frequent requests involved content generation and expansion, followed by source integration and verification, and then concept clarification and definitions. Students also sought chatbot support for writing consultation, text refinement and formatting, and, less frequently, rephrasing and modifying content and translation assistance. The most frequent communication style was “requesting,” marked by direct appeals for assistance, followed by “questioning” and “declarative” styles. In terms of communication tone, “neutral” and “praising” appeals dominated the interactions, reflecting engagement and appreciation for chatbot responses, while “reprimanding” tones were relatively low. These findings highlight the need for tailored chatbot interventions that encourage students to seek AI assistance for a broader and more in-depth range of writing tasks
Academic writing · Chatbot · Mathematics education · Multimedia · World Wide Web · AI in Service Interactions · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Computer Science · Online Learning and Analytics · Psychology
Mapping student-AI interaction dynamics in multi-agent learning environments
Artificial intelligence in academic writing
How do pedagogical approaches affect the impact of chatbots on learning performance? A meta-analysis and research synthesis
Comparative analysis of high and low performers’ use of generative AI in EFL academic writing
Using chatbot in education – A systematic review and research agenda
Does the Thesis Still Make Sense? A Comparative Analysis of Scientific Essays Generated by Humans and Generative Artificial Intelligence
Blending Generative AI and Instructor-Led Learning
Killing Educators’ Nightmare—Opportunities and Challenges When Using GenAI in Marking an Essay Assignment
A grounded theory approach to profiling student competencies in GAI-based teaching and learning environments
Who grades best? Comparing ChatGPT, peer, and instructor evaluations across varying levels of student project quality
Generative AI vs. instructor vs. peer assessments
Academic socialisation through AI and peer feedback in doctoral writing
The impact of a virtual teaching assistant (chatbot) on students' learning in Ghanaian higher education
Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students
Students’ voices on generative AI
A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education
Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom
Empowering educators to be AI-ready
How AI can be a force for good
Exploring Students’ Perceptions of ChatGPT
Using chatbots to support student goal setting and social presence in fully online activities
Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education
What if the devil is my guardian angel
Role of AI chatbots in education
Not quite eye to A.I.
ChatGPT in education
Chatbot learning partners
ChatGPT and the digitisation of writing
Academic Writing Challenges and Supports
Strategies for Integrating Generative AI into Higher Education
Impacts of an AI-based chabot on college students’ after-class review, academic performance, self-efficacy, learning attitude, and motivation
Chatbots for learning
Peer assessment in a project-based engineering course
Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators
ChatGPT and its ethical implications for STEM research and higher education
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Human-AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 12 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |