Ujaran Kebencian Facebook Tahun 2017-2019
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22057727 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Devita Indah Permatasari (State University of Semarang), Subyantoro (0000-0002-4365-5993, State University of Semarang), Subyantoro Subyantoro2 |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 62-70 |
| Publication date | 2020-03-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Jurnal Sastra Indonesia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2252-6315 • E-ISSN: 2685-9599 |
| Publisher | Universitas Negeri Semarang (PUBLISHER • ID) |
| DOI | 10.15294/jsi.v9i1.33020 |
| OpenAlex | W3016584253 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengklasifikasi dan menganalisis bentuk ujaran kebencian pada facebook Ahmad Dhani Prasetyo (ADP). Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan teoretis dan metodologis. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan metodologis berupa metode deskriptif kualitatif dan pendekatan teoretis menggunakan pendekatan linguistik forensik dengan pisau bedah analisis pragmatik. Metode dan teknik yang digunakan dalam penyediaan atau pengumpulan data adalah metode simak dengan teknik sadap dan teknik catat. Metode dan teknik yang digunakan untuk menganalisis data menggunakan metode padan dengan subjenis padan pragmatis. Metode dan teknik yang digunakan untuk menyajikan hasil analisis data adalah metode formal dan informal. Hasil penelitian ini ditemukan ujaran kebencian bentuk memprovokasi, ujaran kebencian bentuk menghasut, ujaran kebencian bentuk menghina, ujaran kebencian bentuk menistakan, ujaran kebencian bentuk pencemaran nama baik, dan ujaran kebencian bentuk penyebaran berita bohong. This study aimed to (1) classify and analyze the types of utterances of hate speech on Ahmad Dhani Prasetyo's (ADP) Facebook account. The research approaches used in this study were theoretical and methodological approach. This study used a methodical approach in form of a qualitative descriptive method and theoretical approach used a forensic linguistic approach with a scalpel pragmatic analysis. The methods and techniques used in the provision or collection of the data were scrutinizing method by using extracting technique and note-taking technique. The methods and techniques used in analyzing the data used the equivalence method with pragmatic equivalence sub type. The methods and techniques used to present the results of the data analysis were formal and informal methods. In the results of this study, illocutionary utterances of hate speech in form of provoking, illocutionary utterances of hate speech in form of inciting, illocutionary utterances of hate speech in form of insulting, illocutionary utterances of hate speech in form of defamation, illocutionary utterances of hate speech in form of defamation and into utterances of hate speech in form of the false news spreading
Art · Humanities · Computer Science · Islamic Finance and Communication · Legal and Social Justice Studies · Linguistics and Language Analysis · Mathematics
Political Buzzer in Islamic Law and Its Impact on Muslim Society
Dehumanisasi ujaran kebencian dalam penggunaan kata ‘lu’ pada komentar Instagram Rachel Vennya
Ujaran Kebencian Media Sosial Instagram Baim Wong Kasus Prank Polisi
Strategi, Jenis Tindak Tutur dan Pola Tutur Pencemaran Nama Baik di Media Sosial
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,8 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2024 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |