When the media coverage of “scholarly” knowledge and researchers question the meaning of science
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22061573 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marie-Christine Lipani (Université Bordeaux Montaigne), Catherine Pascal (Université Bordeaux Montaigne) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2263-0856 • E-ISSN: 2263-0856 |
| Publisher | OpenEdition (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4000/rfsic.11535 |
| OpenAlex | W3160662178 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
Science is not immune to the grasp of communication. Scientists neither. Communication, in the sense of transmission, is the very essence of science. “Do I need to say that in science, explained Lacan, in contrast to magic and religion, knowledge is communicated”. In other words, it is the responsibility of scientists to make known and share the results of their work and their discoveries with the general public, especially since science, on the one hand, is everywhere in our daily lives. New
Epistemology · GRASP · Science communication · Science education · Sociology · Computer Science · Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Philosophy · Science and Science Education
| Highly cited | No |
|---|