Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Intermingled Interests

Social Housing, Speculative Building, and Architectural Practice in 1970s and 1980s Pune (India)

Bibliographic Data

ID22065207
AuthorsSarah Melsens (0000-0002-9588-6232, University of Minnesota), Inge Bertels (0000-0001-9373-1424, University of Minnesota), Amit Srivastava (0000-0002-6071-9354, University of Minnesota)
Year2022
Volume20
Publication date2022-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueABE Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2275-6639 • E-ISSN: 2275-6639
PublisherOpenEdition (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.4000/abe.13394
OpenAlexW4308591045
LanguageEN
References cited1

This article presents case studies of two apartment projects built in the Western Indian city of Pune (formerly Poona) in the 1970s and 1980s. While their architecture is unassuming, the histories of their realisation provide a powerful account of how transformations in building policy shaped notions of professional architectural practice in India at the time. In particular, the cases illustrate how rank-and-file architects found themselves caught in the tension between, on the one hand, a socialist state eager to apply welfare measures but unable to execute them autonomously and, on the other hand, private-sector entrepreneurship looking for opportunities to satisfy increasing demands for home ownership. The article begins with an exploration of how this tension resulted in an intensification of the building bureaucracy. The second part investigates how modes of this bureaucracy, in turn, affected architectural patronage, the daily tasks expected of architects, and built architecture itself. Going beyond traditional architectural references, the study draws upon building regulation, oral history, and bureaucratic correspondence retrieved from the previously undisclosed archives of the architects. The narrative revealed by these sources challenges dominant notions of architectural expertise while highlighting the agency of paperwork―correspondence, administrative forms, and plans―as producers, rather than factual representations, of architectural form. As such, this inquiry into everyday local contexts of production offers a new perspective from which to evaluate buildings that are conventionally dismissed as derivative or lacking any critical thinking

Aesthetics · Architectural engineering · Art · Bureaucracy · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Visual arts · Engineering · Law · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies · Urban Planning and Governance · Water Governance and Infrastructure · Architecture

  • Prejudice and Pragmatism

    Amy Thomas•Grey Room•2018

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae