How political and social attitude could help to fully adopt the circular economy concepts for national benefit? A comparative study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22065552 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Milena Ilić (0000-0002-9719-175X, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts), Marko Ranković (0000-0002-3479-8431, Univerzitet Union Nikola Tesla), Milutin Dobrilović (University of Belgrade), Dušan Stojaković (Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts), Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniș (0000-0003-2708-1325, National Academy of Physical Education and Sport), Larisa Mihoreanu (0000-0002-9397-7018, Bucharest University of Economic Studies), Rocsana Bucea-ManeaȚoniş |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 66-75 |
| Publication date | 2021-12-30 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Economic Development Environment and People (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2285-3642 • E-ISSN: 2285-3642 |
| Publisher | Fundatia Romania de Maine (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.26458/jedep.v10i4.713 |
| OpenAlex | W4200079054 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
This comparative study shows how concepts like circular economy, innovation and competitiveness are understood, accepted and implemented in Romania and Serbia, countries with similar preoccupations for the European Union's recommendations and destiny. It is shown that the similar results obtained outline the lack of continuity in applying the resilient strategy for general development and the strategic role of investments as a pillar of modernisation. Building a resilient and modern society requires fundamental and complex changes in the political decision-makers attitude and people's civic behaviour, linked to the circular economy principles, the need for substantial investments in top innovative research, high-tech products, and adequate public policies of general interest
Circular economy · Economic growth · Economic policy · Economic system · Economics · European union · Modernization theory · Pillar · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Economic and Business Development Strategies · Engineering · Global Trade and Competitiveness · Socio-economic Development and Sustainability
| Highly cited | No |
|---|