Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Application of a semi-automated dicentric scoring system in triage and monitoring occupational radiation exposure

Bibliographic Data

ID22066384
AuthorsYounghyun Lee (0009-0005-7408-6729, Soonchunhyang University), Seung Hyun Kim (0000-0001-5779-3177, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences), Yang Hee Lee (0000-0002-9537-3306, Soonchunhyang University), Su San Yang (Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences), Hyo Jin Yoon (0000-0001-7159-9688, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences), Ruth C Wilkins (0000-0002-9621-477X, Health Canada), Seongjae Jang (0000-0001-8116-2279, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume10
Pages1002501-1002501
Publication date2022-10-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2022.1002501
PMID36339161
OpenAlexW4306867302
LanguageEN
References cited27

The dicentric chromosome assay (DCA) is considered the gold standard for radiation biodosimetry, but it is limited by its long dicentric scoring time and need for skilled scorers. The automation of scoring dicentrics has been considered a strategy to overcome the constraints of DCA. However, the studies on automated scoring methods are limited compared to those on conventional manual DCA. Our study aims to assess the performance of a semi-automated scoring method for DCA using ex vivo and in vivo irradiated samples. Dose estimations of 39 blind samples irradiated ex vivo and 35 industrial radiographers occupationally exposed in vivo were estimated using the manual and semi-automated scoring methods and subsequently compared. The semi-automated scoring method, which removed the false positives of automated scoring using the dicentric chromosome (DC) scoring algorithm, had an accuracy of 94.9% in the ex vivo irradiated samples. It also had more than 90% accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity to distinguish binary dose categories reflecting clinical, diagnostic, and epidemiological significance. These data were comparable to those of manual DCA. Moreover, Cohen's kappa statistic and McNemar's test showed a substantial agreement between the two methods for categorizing in vivo samples into never and ever radiation exposure. There was also a significant correlation between the two methods. Despite of comparable results with two methods, lower sensitivity of semi-automated scoring method could be limited to assess various radiation exposures. Taken together, our findings show the semi-automated scoring method can provide accurate dose estimation rapidly, and can be useful as an alternative to manual DCA for biodosimetry in large-scale accidents or cases to monitor radiation exposure of radiation workers

Automated method · Biodosimetry · Biology · Chromosome · Cohen's kappa · Dicentric chromosome · Ex vivo · False positive paradox · In vivo · Irradiation · Kappa · Machine learning · McNemar's test · Nuclear medicine · Radiology · Statistics · Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment · Computer Science · Mathematics · Medicine · Radiation Dose and Imaging · Radioactivity and Radon Measurements · Artificial Intelligence

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae