Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Citobot AI for real-world cervical cancer screening using colposcopy imaging

Bibliographic Data

ID22067599
AuthorsMarcela Arrivillaga (0000-0001-5927-3386, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana), Daniela Neira (Ministerio de Salud), David Steven Rivero (Pontificia Universidad Javeriana), Hernán Dario Vargas-Cardona (Pontificia Universidad Javeriana), Paula C Bermúdez (0000-0001-8282-4027, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana), Juan Pablo García-Cifuentes (0000-0002-0911-7091, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana), Juan Carlos Aristizabal (0000-0001-5781-5903, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana), Maria del Mar Torres (Pontificia Universidad Javeriana), Andres Jaramillo-Botero (0000-0003-2844-0756, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana), Diana Maria Castrillón (Ministerio de Salud)
Year2026
Volume14
Pages1802494-1802494
Publication date2026-06-12
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2026.1802494
PMID42368966
OpenAlexW7164483067
LanguageEN
References cited23

Background: Cervical cancer remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality among women, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where delays in screening and diagnostic follow-up limit early detection. Artificial intelligence applied to medical imaging may strengthen screening programs by improving accuracy, consistency, and timeliness in resource-limited settings. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the internally validated screening performance of CITOBOT AI, an artificial intelligence system for real-world cervical cancer screening using colposcopy imaging, in a public hospital setting in Colombia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 650 women screened at 'Siloé' Hospital in Cali, Colombia, between February 2023 and July 2025. Colposcopy-guided biopsy served as the reference standard. A total of 2,648 cervical images were classified using a predefined binary endpoint: screen-negative/no risk versus screen-positive/at risk. The model was developed using transfer learning, image segmentation, data augmentation, patient-level data partitioning, and five-fold cross-validation within the training subset. Screening performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, predictive values, and confusion matrix analysis. A secondary exploratory analysis examined associations between selected clinical variables and AI-based screening classification. Results: CITOBOT AI achieved internally validated screening performance with an accuracy of 94.3%, sensitivity of 93.4%, specificity of 94.9%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.98. Positive and negative predictive values were 92.9 and 96.2%, respectively. Performance estimates were stable across patient-level folds and consistent with the hold-out validation subset within the same dataset. HPV status showed an unexpected inverse association with AI screen-positive classification; this finding should not be interpreted as biologically protective or as evidence that HPV status influenced model output, since HPV status was not used as an input variable. Conclusion: CITOBOT AI demonstrated promising internally validated performance for real-world cervical cancer screening based on colposcopy imaging. The predefined binary classification is consistent with its intended role as a screening support tool to identify women who may require confirmatory colposcopy and biopsy, while histopathology remains the reference standard for lesion grading and therapeutic decision-making. External validation in independent multicenter and population-based datasets is required before broader implementation

Cancer screening · Cervical cancer · Cervical cancer screening · Cervical screening · Cervix · Colposcopy · Medical record · Receiver operating characteristic · Triage · AI in cancer detection · Cervical Cancer and HPV Research · Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments

  • Cancer statistics for the year 2020

    Open Access•J Ferlay, Murielle Colombet et al.•International Journal of Cancer•2021

  • Machine Learning Assisted Cervical Cancer Detection

    Open Access•Mavra Mehmood, Muhammad Rizwan et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2021

  • Associated factors and global adherence of cervical cancer screening in 2019

    Open Access•Wanting Zhang, Kai Gao et al.•Globalization and Health•2022

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae