Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Strengthening integrated community case management through digitalization and performance management in Busia County, Kenya

Bibliographic Data

ID22067737
AuthorsJoseph Kyalo Njoroge, J Njoroge, Tabither Gitau (0000-0002-2114-2134, corresponding author), Tabither Muthoni Gitau, Erick Kiprotich Yegon, Nzomo Mwita, Alice Koimur, Marlyn Ochieng, Rhonnie Omollo, Rosebellah Amihanda
Year2025
Volume13
Pages1612973-1612973
Publication date2025-09-03
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612973
PMID40969637
OpenAlexW4413961657
LanguageEN
References cited29

Kenya continues to face a high burden of childhood mortality driven by preventable illnesses such as diarrhea, malaria, and pneumonia. Integrated community case management (iCCM) offers a strategy for mitigating this burden through community-level diagnosis, treatment, and referral. This study assessed the role of digitalization and performance management in enhancing the effectiveness of the iCCM strategy in Busia County. Using a quasi-experimental design, a comparison of iCCM intervention outcomes in Nambale sub-county with a non-iCCM comparison site in Teso South sub-county was done. Data were collected through household surveys and in-depth interviews. Results showed a significant improvement in healthcare-seeking behavior in the intervention site, with 56% of caregivers reporting that they sought care for pneumonia on the same day of symptom onset, compared to 35% in the comparison site ( p = 0.031). Additionally, findings indicate that CHPs were a preferred point of care for iCCM cases in the intervention site, managing 38% of malaria cases, 19% of pneumonia cases, and 25% of diarrhea cases at the community level. This contrasts with the comparison site, where only 16, 3.7, and 0% of malaria, pneumonia, and diarrhea cases, respectively, were managed by CHPs, all differences being statistically significant ( p < 0.05). The significantly higher proportion of iCCM cases managed by CHPs in the intervention site was associated with a lower reliance on facility-based care. Only 42% of ARI cases were managed at government facilities in the intervention site compared to 62% in the comparison site ( p = 0.024), while just 1.9% of cases were handled at private facilities in the intervention site versus 12.2% in the comparison site ( p = 0.03). These improvements were made possible by the integration of the digital tools and robust performance management practices. This combination enhanced CHWs effectiveness, strengthened health seeking behaviors, and contributed to the overall success of the iCCM strategy in the intervention area. In conclusion, digitalization and robust performance management strengthen the iCCM strategy leading to improved by improving health care seeking for childhood illnesses behaviors and reduce health system burden in low-resource settings

Business · Case management · Community Management · Community-based management · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Management · Operations management · Process management · Engineering · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration

  • Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions

    Open Access•Joseph L Fleiss, Bruce Levin et al.•Statistical methods for rates and…•2003

  • Million community health workers in sub-Saharan Africa by 2015

    Prabhjot Singh, Jeff Sachs et al.•The Lancet•2013

  • What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies

    J Francis, Jill J Francis et al.•Psychology & Health•2010

  • Global, regional, and national levels of maternal mortality, 1990–2015

    Open Access•Nicholas J Kassebaum, Ryan M Barber et al.•The Lancet•2016

  • Community Health Workers and Mobile Technology

    Open Access•Rebecca Braun, Caricia Catalani et al.•PLoS ONE•2013

  • The cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions

    Open Access•Andrea Gentili, Giovanna Failla et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  • Antenatal screening practices in the WHO European Region

    Open Access•Marzia Lazzerini, Benedetta Armocida et al.•Journal of Global Health•2020

  • Best practices in scaling digital health in low and middle income countries

    Open Access•Alain Labrique, Christina Wadhwani et al.•Globalization and Health•2018

  • Supervising community health workers in low-income countries – a review of impact and implementation issues

    Open Access•Zelee Hill, Mari Dumbaugh et al.•Global Health Action•2014

  • Who is a community health worker? – a systematic review of definitions

    Open Access•Abimbola Olaniran, Helen Smith et al.•Global Health Action•2017

  • Primary healthcare seeking behaviour of low-income patients across the public and private health sectors in South Africa

    Open Access•K Govender, Sarah Girdwood et al.•BMC Public Health•2021

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae