Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A cost-utility analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing in high-risk breast cancer patients and family members in Thailand

A cost-effective policy in resource-limited settings

Bibliographic Data

ID22068374
AuthorsPongtawat Lertwilaiwittaya (0000-0002-8808-3829, Siriraj Hospital), Narisa Tantai (Siriraj Hospital), Satanun Maneeon (Siriraj Hospital), Sophittha Kongbunrak (Siriraj Hospital), Nongyao Nonpanya (University of Alabama at Birmingham), Anna C E Hurst, Anna Hurst (0000-0002-9765-9703, University of Alabama at Birmingham), Varalak Srinonprasert (0000-0001-5311-7657, Siriraj Hospital, corresponding author), Manop Pithukpakorn (0000-0003-3611-5718, Siriraj Hospital, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume11
Pages1257668-1257668
Publication date2023-12-14
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2023.1257668
PMID38162618
OpenAlexW4389733275
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited26

Background: variants (gBRCA) in high-risk breast cancer patients is known to be cost-effective in high-income countries. Nationwide adoption of genetics testing in high-risk breast cancer population remains poor. Our study aimed to assess gBRCA health economics data in the middle-income country setting of Thailand. Methods: Decision tree and Markov model were utilized to assess cost-utility between the testing vs. no-testing groups from a societal and lifetime perspective and lifetime. We interviewed 264 patients with breast/ovarian cancer and their family members to assess relevant costs and quality of life using EQ-5D-5L. One-way sensitivity, probabilistic sensitivity (Monte Carlo simulation), and budget impact analyses were done to estimate the outcome under Thailand's Universal Health Coverage scheme. Results: The predicted lifetime cost and Quality-adjusted Life Years (QALY) for those with breast cancer were $13,788 and 10.22 in the testing group and $13,702 and 10.07 in the no-testing group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for gBRCA testing in high-risk breast cancer patients was $573/QALY. The lifetime cost for the family members of those with gBRCA was $14,035 (QALY 9.99), while the no-testing family members group was $14,077 (QALY 9.98). Performing gBRCA testing in family members was cost-saving. Conclusion: Cost-utility analysis demonstrated a cost-effective result of gBRCA testing in high-risk breast cancer patients and cost-saving in familial cascade testing. The result was endorsed in the national health benefits package in 2022. Other middle-income countries may observe the cost-effective/cost-saving aspects in common genetic diseases under their national health schemes

Breast cancer · Cancer · Cost effectiveness · Environmental health · Genetic testing · Population · Quality-adjusted life year · BRCA gene mutations in cancer · Genomics and Rare Diseases · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Medicine · Internal Medicine · Oncology

  • Approaches to economic evaluations of complex interventions in thailand

    Open Access•Luxzup Wattanasukchai, Yuejiao Duan et al.•BMC Public Health•2025

  • ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing

    Open Access•Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg et al.•Genetics in Medicine•2013

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae