Association between extended-release buprenorphine adherence and reduced healthcare costs among insured patients with opioid use disorder
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22068426 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michelle Jerry (Analytical Services), Divya Venkat (0000-0002-8187-3190, Allegheny Health Network), Courtney Flynn (Indivior (United States)), Anh Thu Tran (0000-0002-9605-936X, Analytical Services), Maher Abdel-Sattar (Indivior (United States)), William Mullen (0000-0002-5685-1563, Indivior (United States), corresponding author), Colleen Lane (Addiction Medicine, Corewell Health West), Colleen E Lane (0000-0002-1449-9522, American Society of Addiction Medicine) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Pages | 1774410-1774410 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1774410 |
| PMID | 41869622 |
| OpenAlex | W7133957125 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 10 |
Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between adherence to extended-release buprenorphine (BUP-XR; SUBLOCADE®) and reduced healthcare utilization and medical costs among patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). Methods: This retrospective analysis of United States insurance claims included patients aged ≥18 years who initiated BUP-XR between 3/1/2019-12/31/2022 (index = earliest BUP-XR claim) in the MerativeTM MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Databases. Patients had continuous enrollment (medical, pharmacy, and behavioral benefits) for 12 months before (baseline period) and 12 months after (follow-up period) the index date. Proportion of days covered (PDC) was used to assess adherence to both BUP-XR and medications for OUD (MOUD) overall during the follow-up period. Patients were assigned to four mutually-exclusive groups: Group 1 (adherent [PDC ≥ 0.8] to BUP-XR treatment); Group 2 (non-adherent to BUP-XR but adherent to overall MOUD); Group 3 (non-adherent to overall MOUD and primarily treated with BUP-XR); Group 4 (non-adherent to overall MOUD and not primarily treated with BUP-XR). Descriptive and adjusted analyses compared total non-MOUD costs in the follow-up period of Group 1 (reference) to the other groups. Results: Of 661 patients, 24.7% were adherent to BUP-XR (Group 1) during the 12-month follow-up period (Group 2: 17.1%, Group 3: 39.9%, Group 4: 18.3%). Compared to other groups, patients adherent to BUP-XR (Group 1) had the lowest rates of inpatient, emergency department, and detoxification visits. Adjusted non-MOUD costs during the 12-month follow-up period were $35,761 (Group 1), $50,778 (Group 2), $29,599 (Group 3), and $44,739 (Group 4). Despite both groups having PDC ≥ 0.8, patients adherent to BUP-XR (Group 1) had $15,017 reduced costs per person compared to those adherent to overall MOUD (Group 2). The lower adjusted costs observed in Groups 3 and 4 reflected patient disengagement from care, characterized by substantially fewer outpatient services and higher acute care utilization. Conclusion: Sustained BUP-XR adherence reduced costly medical utilization compared to non-adherence to BUP-XR while maintaining adherence to overall MOUD
Buprenorphine · Group B · Health care · Health insurance · Medical costs · Opioid use disorder · Retrospective cohort study · Young adult · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk · Opioid Use Disorder Treatment · Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |