Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Comparative analysis of asbestos body and fiber content in formalin-fixed vs. paraffin-embedded lung tissue

Bibliographic Data

ID22068975
AuthorsBarbara K Kuhn (0000-0003-4639-735X, Swiss Institute for Art Research, corresponding author), Bart Vrugt (0000-0001-6063-832X, Triemli Hospital), Alex Low (Gradient (United States)), Julie E Goodman (0000-0002-2199-1646, Gradient (United States)), Richard Attanoos (0000-0001-5254-3232, University Hospital of Wales)
Year2025
Volume13
Pages1590802-1590802
Publication date2025-06-11
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2025.1590802
PMID40567954
OpenAlexW4411221892
LanguageEN
References cited22

Introduction: Asbestos body and fiber burdens may be determined using different preparations of lung tissue. Paraffin-embedded tissue requires more complex steps than formalin-fixed tissue. A prior study highlighted potential variations in the measurement of retained mineral fibers in different lung preparations and prompted this expanded interlaboratory analysis. Data from exposed subjects referred to a Swiss laboratory were compared with the results of mineral analysis obtained from a laboratory based in the United Kingdom. Methods: Numbers of asbestos bodies were determined in formalin-fixed tissue and corresponding paraffin blocks of 62 subjects in Zurich by NaOCl digestion. Fiber burden was measured in a total of 104 subjects (62 subjects in Zurich and 42 subjects in Cardiff). Results: Asbestos body and amphibole asbestos fiber counts obtained from paraffin blocks were noted to be, in general, lower than counts obtained from formalin-fixed tissue. The limits of detection were higher in paraffin blocks than in formalin-fixed tissue. Similar trends were obtained in the two laboratories. Discussion: In this comparative mineral analytic study, the authors focused on the potential significance of differing specimen preparations (formalin-fixed wet lung versus paraffin wax-embedded block extraction) investigating paired samples. The results generally reflect numerically higher fiber burdens in samples analyzed from wet lungs compared with counterpart paraffin wax tissue. Mineral analysis by electron microscopic analysis remains the most objective measure of the respirable fraction of mineral dust as it correlates most directly with disease risk

Asbestos · Asbestos fibers · Composite material · Fiber · Lung · Pathology · Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis · Materials Science · Medicine · Occupational and environmental lung diseases · Occupational exposure and asthma · Internal Medicine

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae