Community-University Partnership Characteristics for Translation
Evidence From CDC's Prevention Research Centers
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22069576 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Belinda-Rose Young (0000-0003-4131-9088, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, autor de correspondencia), Kimberly D Leeks (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Connie L Bish (0000-0003-0985-6043, The Centers), Paul Mihas (0000-0003-1651-4121, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Rose A Marcelin (Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health), Jennifer Kline (Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education), Brigette Ulin (The Centers, autor de correspondencia), Brigette F Ulin |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 8 |
| Páginas | 79-79 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-03-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Editorial | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00079 |
| PMID | 32266196 |
| OpenAlex | W3011872515 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 16 |
Background: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Prevention Research Centers (PRC) Program supports community engagement and partnerships to translate health evidence into practice. Translation is dependent on the quality of partnerships. However, questions remain about the necessary characteristics to develop and maintain translation partnerships. Aim: To identify the characteristics that influence community-university partnerships and examine alignment with the Knowledge to Action (K2A) Framework. Methods: Final Progress Reports (N=37) from PRCs funded from September 2009 – September 2014 were reviewed in 2016-2017 to determine eligibility. Eligible PRCs included those that translated an innovation following the applied research phase (2009-2014) of the PRC award (n=12). The PRCs and the adopters (i.e., community organizations) were recruited and participated in qualitative interviews in 2017. Results: Ten PRCs (83.3% response rate) and four adopters participated. Twelve codes (i.e., elements) were found that impacted partnerships along the translation continuum (e.g., adequate communication, technical assistance). Each element aligned with the K2A Framework at multiple steps within the translation phase. The intersection between the element and step in the translation phase is termed a “characteristic”. Using interview data, fifty-two unique partnership characteristics for translation were found. Discussion and Conclusion: The results suggest multiple characteristics that impact translation partnerships. The inclusion of these partnership characteristics in policies and practices that seek to move practice-based or research-based evidence into widespread use may impact the receptivity by partners and evidence uptake by communities. Using the K2A Framework to assess translation partnerships was helpful and should be considered in process evaluations to inform translation partnership improvement
Community engagement · General partnership · Knowledge management · Knowledge translation · Medical education · Political science · Psychological intervention · Public relations · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Nursing · Public Health Policies and Education
Making research relevant
Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework
Community Engagement in Research
Knowledge brokering
Translating evidence-based treatments into child welfare services through community-university partnerships
From Controlled Trial to Community Adoption
Can Public Health Researchers and Agencies Reconcile the Push From Funding Bodies and the Pull From Communities
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |