Cost–utility and price threshold analysis of sacituzumab tirumotecan versus single-agent chemotherapy for previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in China
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22069952 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Liman Huo (0000-0003-0078-4047, Hebei Medical University), Xiaojie Feng (Hebei Medical University), Ping Liang (0000-0002-7409-9504, Hebei Medical University), Yajing Wang (0000-0002-6874-815X, Hebei Medical University), Haoyang Peng (Hebei Medical University), Rong Guo (0000-0002-0807-1490, Hebei Medical University), Rui Feng (0000-0001-8680-5851, Hebei Medical University, corresponding author), Ying Zheng (0000-0001-5060-8581, Department of Pharmacy, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Pages | 1786762-1786762 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-23 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1786762 |
| PMID | 42110256 |
| OpenAlex | W7155363076 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 20 |
Background: Sacituzumab tirumotecan (Sac-TMT) has demonstrated survival benefits over chemotherapy in patients with previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). However, its economic value under different payment contexts in China remains uncertain. Methods: A state-transition (Markov) model was used to estimate lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for Sac-TMT versus single-agent chemotherapy in second-line and later-line mTNBC. Clinical efficacy was derived from a phase III randomized trial, with survival extrapolated using parametric models. Cost-utility and price threshold analyses were conducted using willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds defined as three times the per-capita gross domestic product (GDP) at the national level and in economically underdeveloped regions. Scenarios incorporating patient assistance programs were also evaluated. Results: Sac-TMT increased QALYs but incurred substantially higher costs, resulting in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios exceeding both national and regional WTP thresholds at the current list price. To achieve cost-effectiveness, the price of Sac-TMT would need to be reduced to 48.3% of the current list price under the national WTP threshold and to 34.9% under the regional threshold. Although patient assistance programs increased the acceptable price range, Sac-TMT remained unlikely to be cost-effective at the list price. The reimbursed price following the 2025 national health insurance negotiation was markedly below these thresholds, suggesting improved economic value under current reimbursement conditions. Conclusion: Sac-TMT is unlikely to be cost-effective at its current list price for previously treated mTNBC in China. Substantial price reductions and reimbursement strategies may improve its economic value, particularly in economically underdeveloped regions
Breast cancer · China · List price · Metastatic breast cancer · Payment · Reimbursement · Willingness to pay · Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies · Breast Cancer Treatment Studies · Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|