Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cost–utility and price threshold analysis of sacituzumab tirumotecan versus single-agent chemotherapy for previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in China

Bibliographic Data

ID22069952
AuthorsLiman Huo (0000-0003-0078-4047, Hebei Medical University), Xiaojie Feng (Hebei Medical University), Ping Liang (0000-0002-7409-9504, Hebei Medical University), Yajing Wang (0000-0002-6874-815X, Hebei Medical University), Haoyang Peng (Hebei Medical University), Rong Guo (0000-0002-0807-1490, Hebei Medical University), Rui Feng (0000-0001-8680-5851, Hebei Medical University, corresponding author), Ying Zheng (0000-0001-5060-8581, Department of Pharmacy, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University)
Year2026
Volume14
Pages1786762-1786762
Publication date2026-04-23
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2026.1786762
PMID42110256
OpenAlexW7155363076
LanguageEN
References cited20

Background: Sacituzumab tirumotecan (Sac-TMT) has demonstrated survival benefits over chemotherapy in patients with previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). However, its economic value under different payment contexts in China remains uncertain. Methods: A state-transition (Markov) model was used to estimate lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for Sac-TMT versus single-agent chemotherapy in second-line and later-line mTNBC. Clinical efficacy was derived from a phase III randomized trial, with survival extrapolated using parametric models. Cost-utility and price threshold analyses were conducted using willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds defined as three times the per-capita gross domestic product (GDP) at the national level and in economically underdeveloped regions. Scenarios incorporating patient assistance programs were also evaluated. Results: Sac-TMT increased QALYs but incurred substantially higher costs, resulting in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios exceeding both national and regional WTP thresholds at the current list price. To achieve cost-effectiveness, the price of Sac-TMT would need to be reduced to 48.3% of the current list price under the national WTP threshold and to 34.9% under the regional threshold. Although patient assistance programs increased the acceptable price range, Sac-TMT remained unlikely to be cost-effective at the list price. The reimbursed price following the 2025 national health insurance negotiation was markedly below these thresholds, suggesting improved economic value under current reimbursement conditions. Conclusion: Sac-TMT is unlikely to be cost-effective at its current list price for previously treated mTNBC in China. Substantial price reductions and reimbursement strategies may improve its economic value, particularly in economically underdeveloped regions

Breast cancer · China · List price · Metastatic breast cancer · Payment · Reimbursement · Willingness to pay · Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies · Breast Cancer Treatment Studies · Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology

  • Global cancer statistics 2022

    Open Access•Francesca Bray, Mathieu Laversanne et al.•CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians•2024

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae