Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Exposure of Ophthalmologists to Patients' Exhaled Droplets in Clinical Practice

A Numerical Simulation of Sars-CoV-2 Exposure Risk

Bibliographic Data

ID22070556
AuthorsYanchao Fan (Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology), Li Liu (0000-0002-5257-3391, Tsinghua University, corresponding author), Hui Zhang (0000-0002-8814-226X, corresponding author), Yingping Deng (0000-0001-7653-658X, Sichuan University, corresponding author), Yi Wang (0000-0003-2228-7009, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology), Mengjie Duan (0000-0003-4585-1901, Tsinghua University), Huan Wang (0000-0003-3219-7226, Tsinghua University), Lixiang Wang (0000-0002-9878-6464, Sichuan University), Leifeng Han (Shanghai Xiandai Architectural Design), Yalin Liu (0000-0003-0337-6380, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology)
Year2021
Volume9
Pages725648-725648
Publication date2021-09-20
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2021.725648
PMID34616707
OpenAlexW3199515619
LanguageEN
References cited61

Background: Lack of quantification of direct and indirect exposure of ophthalmologists during ophthalmic diagnostic process makes it hard to estimate the infectious risk of aerosol pathogen faced by ophthalmologists at working environment. Methods: Accurate numerical models of thermal manikins and computational fluid dynamics simulations were used to investigate direct (droplet inhalation and mucosal deposition) and indirect exposure (droplets on working equipment) within a half-minute procedure. Three ophthalmic examination or treatment scenarios (direct ophthalmoscopic examination, slit-lamp microscopic examination, and ophthalmic operation) were selected as typical exposure distance, two breathing modes (normal breathing and coughing), three levels of ambient RH (40, 70, and 95%) and three initial droplet sizes (50, 70, and 100 μm) were considered as common working environmental condition. Results: The exposure of an ophthalmologist to a patient's expiratory droplets during a direct ophthalmoscopic examination was found to be 95 times that of a person during normal interpersonal interaction at a distance of 1 m and 12.1, 8.8, and 9.7 times that of an ophthalmologist during a slit-lamp microscopic examination, a surgeon during an ophthalmic operation and an assistant during an ophthalmic operation, respectively. The ophthalmologist's direct exposure to droplets when the patient cough-exhaled was ~7.6 times that when the patient breath-exhaled. Compared with high indoor RH , direct droplet exposure was higher and indirect droplet exposure was lower when the indoor RH was 40%. Conclusion: During the course of performing ophthalmic examinations or treatment, ophthalmologists typically face a high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection by droplet transmission

Airborne transmission · Anesthesia · Exhaled air · Face masks · Inhalation · Pathology · COVID-19 and healthcare impacts · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · Infection Control and Ventilation · Medicine · Ophthalmology · Toxicology

  • The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (Covid-19) outbreak

    Open Access•Hussin A Rothan, Siddappa N Byrareddy•Journal of Autoimmunity•2020

  • Airborne transmission of Sars-CoV-2

    Open Access•Lidia Morawska, Junji Cao•Environment International•2020

  • Aerosol and Surface Stability of Sars-CoV-2 as Compared with Sars-CoV-1

    Open Access•Neeltje van Doremalen, Trenton Bushmaker et al.•New England Journal of Medicine•2020

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae