Revisiting the Effects of Organized Mammography Programs on Inequalities in Breast Screening Uptake

A Multilevel Analysis of Nationwide Data From 1997 to 2017

Dados Bibliográficos

ID22072011
AutoresVladimir Jolidon (0000-0003-2223-592X, University of Geneva, autor correspondente), Vincent De Prez (0000-0002-1531-8818, Ghent University), Piet Bracke (0000-0002-9477-3236, Ghent University), Andrew Bell (0000-0002-8268-5853, University of Sheffield), Claudine Burton-Jeangros (0000-0003-2258-9728, University of Geneva), Stéphane Cullati (0000-0002-3881-446X, University of Geneva)
Ano2022
Volume10
Páginas812776-812776
Data de publicação2022-02-07
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
EditoraFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2022.812776
PMID35198524
OpenAlexW4210651506
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas43

This study revisits the effects of mammography screening programs on inequalities in breast screening uptake in Switzerland. The progressive introduction of regional mammography programs by 12 out of the 26 Swiss cantons (regions) since 1999 offers an opportunity to perform an ecological quasi-experimental study. We examine absolute income and marital status inequalities in mammography uptake, and whether the cantons' implementation of mammography programs moderate these inequalities, as previous research has devoted little attention to this. We use five waves of the Swiss Health Interview Survey covering the 1997–2017 period and comprising data on 14,267 women aged 50–70. Both up-to-date and ever-screening outcomes are analyzed with multilevel models which assess the mammography programs' within-canton effect. Findings show that higher income women and married women (compared to unmarried women) had significantly higher mammography uptake probabilities. Mammography programs did not moderate absolute income differences in up-to-date screening; however, they were associated with smaller absolute income differences in ever-screening uptake. Mammography programs related to higher screening uptake for married women, more than for unmarried women. In conclusion, we showed absolute income inequalities in mammography uptake which were not revealed by previous studies using relative inequality measures. Mammography programs may have contributed to reducing income inequalities in ever-screening, yet this was not observed for up-to-date screening. This study has implication for preventive health interventions—e.g., cancer screening promotion should pay attention to women's marital status since screening programs may widen the screening gap between married and unmarried women

Breast cancer · Breast cancer screening · Cancer · Cancer screening · Environmental health · Family medicine · Inequality · Mammography · Mammography screening · Marital status · Population · Psychological intervention · Sociology · Cancer Risks and Factors · Demography · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Health disparities and outcomes · Medicine · Nursing · Gerontology