Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) in Africa

A systematic review using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR)

Bibliographic Data

ID22073062
AuthorsDzinkambani Moffat Kambalame (Kamuzu University of Health Sciences), Dzinkambani Kambalame (0000-0001-6606-0370, Public Health Institute of Malawi), Trude Margrete Arnesen (Norwegian Institute of Public Health), Jim Mtambo (0000-0003-1422-0795, University of Health Science), Evelyn Chitsa Banda (Public Health Institute of Malawi), John Phuka (0000-0003-4951-8145, Department of Health), Adamson Sinjani Muula (Department of Health)
Year2026
Volume14
Pages1758944-1758944
Publication date2026-02-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2026.1758944
PMID41799447
OpenAlexW7130642365
LanguageEN
References cited93

Background: Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) are crucial for strengthening public health systems in Africa but faces implementation challenges. Despite the growing utility of implementation theories, models, and frameworks in assessing the determinants of innovation implementation, no implementation research theories have examined the determinants of IDSR implementation. This systematic review aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators of IDSR implementation in Africa using a Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Methods: We systematically searched four databases, EMBASE, PUBMED, CINAHL, and Scopus, for studies on IDSR assessments in Africa published between 2010 and 2025. Data on barriers and facilitators were extracted and mapped to CFIR domains and constructs and analyzed deductively using content analysis and inductively using thematic analysis. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Appraisal Tool. The review was reported in alignment with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Results: Thirty-seven studies were included in this analysis. Six CFIR domains and 24 constructs explained the determinants of IDSR implementation. The key barriers identified were limited resources, inadequate access to knowledge/information, and structural constraints in the inner-setting domain. Individual domain factors, such as low motivation and capability, also emerged as crucial barriers. Facilitators included structural characteristics, improved access to knowledge, and adequate resources in the inner setting domain as well as positive innovation outcomes in the outcome domain. Conclusion: The implementation of IDSR encounters complex barriers and opportunities within health facilities. Comprehensive strategies addressing both organizational and individual factors of healthcare facilities are needed. The CFIR framework, alongside the CFIR-ERIC matching tool, provides a foundation for identifying context-specific implementation strategies that lead to improved innovation performance. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024571576, identifier CRD42024571576

Disease surveillance · Health care · Implementation research · Public health · Public health surveillance · Qualitative research · Systematic review · Thematic analysis · Global Maternal and Child Health · Health Policy Implementation Science · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research · Health Informatics

  • The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback

    Open Access•Laura J Damschroder, Caitlin M Reardon et al.•Implementation Science•2022

  • Preparedness and vulnerability of African countries against importations of Covid-19

    Open Access•Marius Gilbert, Giulia Pullano et al.•The Lancet•2020

  • Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks

    Open Access•Phoebe Nilsen, Per Nilsen•Implementation Science•2015

  • Looming threat of Covid-19 infection in Africa

    Open Access•John N Nkengasong, Wessam Mankoula•The Lancet•2020

  • Will Ebola change the game? Ten essential reforms before the next pandemic. The report of the Harvard-LSHTM Independent Panel on the Global Response to Ebola

    Open Access•Suerie Moon, Devi Sridhar et al.•The Lancet•2015

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•BMJ•2021

  • Progress and experiences of implementing an integrated disease surveillance and response system in Somalia; 2016–2023

    Open Access•Steven Ssendagire, Mary Joan Karanja et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • Community-based surveillance of infectious diseases

    Open Access•Catherine R Mcgowan, Emi Takahashi et al.•BMJ Global Health•2022

  • Using a quality improvement approach to improve reporting of malaria deaths in Namutumba District, Eastern Uganda, 2022–2023

    Open Access•Marie Gorreti Zalwango, Richard Migisha et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2025

  • Community-based surveillance system structures and knowledge level of community-based surveillance volunteers on priority diseases in Ghana

    Open Access•Benjamin Adjei, Thomas Hormenu et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2025

  • Influence of organisational culture on the implementation of health sector reforms in low- and middle-income countries

    Open Access•Rahab Mbau, Lucy Gilson•Global Health Action•2018

  • Evaluation of public health surveillance systems in refugee settlements in Uganda, 2016–2019

    Open Access•Alex Riolexus Ario, Emily Atuheire Barigye et al.•Conflict and Health•2022

  • Developing Pre-Implementation Strategies for a Co-Designed, Technology-Assisted Parenting Intervention Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (Eric) Approach

    Open Access•Grace Aldridge, Andrea Reupert et al.•International Journal of…•2024

  • Uganda Mountain Community Health System—Perspectives and Capacities towards Emerging Infectious Disease Surveillance

    Open Access•Aggrey Siya, Richardson Mafigiri et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Organisational culture and trust as influences over the implementation of equity-oriented policy in two South African case study hospitals

    Open Access•Ermin Erasmus, Lucy Gilson et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2017

  • Assessment of the integrated disease surveillance and response system implementation in health zones at risk for viral hemorrhagic fever outbreaks in North Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo, following a major Ebola outbreak, 2021

    Open Access•Ruth Kallay, Gisèle Mbuyi et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  • Evaluation of integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) core and support functions after the revitalisation of IDSR in Uganda from 2012 to 2016

    Open Access•Ben Masiira, Lydia Nakiire et al.•BMC Public Health•2019

  • Evaluation of the integrated disease surveillance and response system for infectious diseases control in northern Ghana

    Open Access•Martin Nyaaba Adokiya, John Koku Awoonor‐Williams et al.•BMC Public Health•2015

  • Survey of the perceptions of key stakeholders on the attributes of the South African Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System

    Open Access•Frew Gerald Benson, Alfred Musekiwa et al.•BMC Public Health•2016

  • Use of technology for public health surveillance reporting

    Open Access•Ian Njeru, David Kareko et al.•BMC Public Health•2020

  • Assessment of the core and support functions of the integrated disease surveillance and response system in Zanzibar, Tanzania

    Open Access•Fatma Saleh, Jovin Kitau et al.•BMC Public Health•2021

  • Challenges of implementing the integrated disease surveillance and response strategy in Zambia

    Open Access•Chomba Mandyata, Chomba Brian Mandyata et al.•BMC Public Health•2017

  • A rapid assessment of the implementation of integrated disease surveillance and response system in Northeast Nigeria, 2017

    Open Access•Luka Mangveep Ibrahim, Mary Stephen et al.•BMC Public Health•2020

  • Health worker knowledge of Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response standard case definitions

    Open Access•Mitsuru Toda, Dejan Zurovac et al.•BMC Public Health•2018

  • The design and implementation of the re-vitalised integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) in Uganda, 2013–2016

    Open Access•Christine Kihembo, Ben Masiira et al.•BMC Public Health•2018

  • Challenges with the implementation of an Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) system

    Open Access•R K Phalkey, S Yamamoto et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2015

  • Knowledge, Awareness, and Compliance of Disease Surveillance and Notification Among Jordanian Physicians in Residency Programs

    Open Access•Nansi Abdulrahim, Ihab Alasasfeh et al.•INQUIRY The Journal of Health…•2019

  • Learning From Covid-19 to Improve Surveillance for Emerging Threats

    Daniel B Jernigan, Dylan George et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2023

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis

    Open Access•Hsiu-Fang Hsieh, Sarah E Shannon•Qualitative Health Research•2005

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae