What are the optimal strategies to communicate the risk of poor air quality exposure to vulnerable groups

Background: Ambient air pollution is a critical global health concern. Individuals living with preexisting health conditions in urban and/or deprived areas and ethnic minorities groups are at particular risk. The WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines have highlighted the importance of effectively communicating the risk of poor air quality exposure to vulnerable groups so they can take actions to protect themselves. This study explored the optimal strategies to communicate this risk to vulnerable groups. Methods: = 50) across a diverse range of vulnerable demographic groups living in North East England, to explore their perspectives around poor air quality and how to communicate this information. Findings: We developed a theory- and evidence-based framework for communicating the health impacts of poor air quality. We identified key components of a communication strategy focussing on the need for: tailored information on risks and harms, a range of inclusive and actionable recommendations, and considerations around the source (healthcare-provider, peers) and channel of communication (SMS, community-based). Interpretation: This study provides novel insights from vulnerable demographic groups supporting the need for air quality information to be accessible, understandable and tailored. Communicating via trusted sources, e.g., healthcare professionals and/or community-based peer networks is important. Further research should explore the impact of interventions on behaviour change, particularly across vulnerable groups

Air pollution · Air quality index · Ethnic group · Focus group · Health care · Psychological intervention · Risk communication · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Risk Perception and Management · Smoking Behavior and Cessation

• A Mathematical Theory of Communication

  Claude E Shannon•Bell System Technical Journal•1948

  Incluir item

• Mobile Text Messaging for Health

  Amanda K Hall, Heather Cole-Lewis et al.•Annual Review of Public Health•2015

  Incluir item

• Pollution and health

  Open Access•Richard Fuller, Philip J Landrigan et al.•The Lancet Planetary Health•2022

  Incluir item

• The theory of planned behavior

  Open Access•Icek Ajzen•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1991

  Incluir item

• The hidden inequality

  Open Access•Lei Hua, Ying Wang et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  Incluir item

• Environmental and Health Impacts of Air Pollution

  Open Access•Ioannis Manisalidis, Elisavet Stavropoulou et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2020

  Incluir item

• A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis

  Open Access•David Byrne•Quality & Quantity•2022

  Incluir item

• ‘Never heard of it’– Understanding the public’s lack of awareness of a new electronic patient record

  Open Access•Tanja Bratan, Katja Stramer et al.•Health Expectations•2010

  Incluir item

• How do we effectively communicate air pollution to change public attitudes and behaviours? A review

  Open Access•Rosie Riley, Laure De Preux et al.•Sustainability Science•2021

  Incluir item

• Using smartphone technology to reduce health impacts from atmospheric environmental hazards

  Open Access•Fay H Johnston, Amanda J Wheeler et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  Incluir item

• Insights into Improving Risk and Safety Communication through Environmental Health Literacy

  Open Access•Marti Lindsey, Ben Richmond et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  Incluir item

• Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies

  Open Access•Kirsti Malterud, Volkert Dirk Siersma et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2016

  Incluir item

• Negotiating the swamp

  Open Access•Linda Finlay•Qualitative Research•2002

  Incluir item