Socioeconomic status and other factors associated with HIV status among OVC in Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)

Bibliographic Data

ID22075013
AuthorsGulzar H Shah (0000-0003-0954-3418, Georgia Southern University, corresponding author), Gina D Etheredge, Lievain Maluantesa (0000-0002-1712-4400), Kristie C Waterfield (0000-0002-9453-5801, Georgia Southern University), Osaremhen Ikhile (0000-0002-9887-1546, Georgia Southern University), Elodie Engetele, Astrid Mulenga, Alice Tabala (Columbia University), Bernard Bossiky (Programme National Multisectoriel de Lutte contre le sida)
Year2022
Volume10
Pages912787-912787
Publication date2022-10-03
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2022.912787
PMID36262234
OpenAlexW4300960651
LanguageEN
References cited24

Background: Orphans and vulnerable children (OVC) are a high-risk group for HIV infection, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa. Purpose: This study aims to portray the socioeconomic profile of OVC and examine the association of household and parent/guardian characteristics with the HIV status of OVC. Methods: For this quantitative retrospective study, we obtained data from ICAP/DRC for a total of 1,624 OVC from households enrolled for social, financial, and clinical services between January 2017 and April 2020 in two provinces of the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haut-Katanga and Kinshasa. We computed descriptive statistics for OVC and their parents' or guardians' characteristics. We used the chi-square test to determine bivariate associations of the predictor variables with the dichotomous dependent variable, HIV positivity status. To analyze the association between these independent variables and the dichotomous dependent variable HIV status after controlling for other covariates, we performed firth's logistic regression. Results: Of the OVC included in this study, 18% were orphans, and 10.9% were HIV+. The chi-square analysis showed that among parents/guardians that were HIV+, a significantly lower proportion of OVC (11.7%) were HIV+ rather than HIV- (26.3%). In contrast, for parents/guardians with HIV- status, 9.0% of OVC were HIV-negative, and 11.7% of OVC were OVC+. The firth's logistic regression also showed the adjusted odds of HIV+ status were significantly lower for OVC with parents/guardians having HIV+ status themselves (AOR, 0.335; 95% CI, 0.171-0.656) compared with HIV-negative parents/guardians. The adjusted odds of HIV+ status were significantly lower for OVC with a monthly household income of $30. Conclusions: Our results suggest that, with the exception of a few household and parent/guardian characteristics, the risk of HIV+ status is prevalent across all groups of OVC within this study, which is consistent with the existing body of evidence showing that OVC are in general vulnerable to HIV infection. With a notable proportion of children who are single or double orphans in DRC, HIV+ OVC constitute a high-risk group that merits customized HIV services. The findings of this study provide data-driven scientific evidence to guide such customization of HIV services

Democracy · Environmental health · Geography · Political science · Politics · Population · Socioeconomic development · Socioeconomic status · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Demography · HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses · HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions · Medicine · Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare · Immunology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access