The ecosystem of human capital in care homes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22075300 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anamarija Kejžar (0000-0001-5495-9928, University of Ljubljana, corresponding author), Katri Maria Turunen, Katri Turunen (0000-0001-6529-1046, Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Pages | 1298833-1298833 |
| Publication date | 2024-03-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1298833 |
| PMID | 38500729 |
| OpenAlex | W4392382284 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 36 |
Introduction: This qualitative study addresses the essential yet often overlooked experiences of knowledge transfer within care homes (CH). Conducted in a Slovenian CH in 2020 and 2023, participants, including CH management, staff, and residents with their relatives, shared perceptions of knowledge transfer at various levels. The study aims to explore barriers and facilitators for knowledge transfer crucial for creating new knowledge, services, and enhancing care quality for older individuals. Methods: Structured focus group interviews were conducted, and data were collected within the CH. The participants' insights into knowledge transfer were probed, covering various dimensions such as between individuals, groups, organizations, and the community. Transcriptions of recorded interviews were analyzed using content analysis. Results: Knowledge transfer within the CH was facilitated through continuous training, diverse communication channels, and mentoring. Collaboration with relatives improved understanding of resident preferences, habits, and overall enhanced the quality of care. This collaborative effort allowed mutual learning and knowledge transfer from the CH to the broader community. Despite potential benefits, there is an underutilization of information and communication technology, e-care, and untapped potential for partnerships, partly due to the scarcity of care. Barriers were identified in the form of stereotypical attitudes towards aging and care, further reinforced by negative news coverage on older people's care. Conclusion: The multidimensional nature of knowledge in CH centers on resident well-being, emphasizing three key aspects of knowledge transfer: between staff and residents, staff and residents' families, and between the CH and the community. In the context of age management, creating opportunities for knowledge transfer is crucial, emphasizing a transition from traditional institutional care to an approach prioritizing knowledge about quality care. and involving experts from experiences in care process
Business · Focus group · Knowledge management · Knowledge transfer · Medical education · Perception · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Scarcity · Sociology · Aging and Gerontology Research · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Marketing
The Death and Life of Great American Cities
Peer support within a health care context
Social capital and health
The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities
Does human capital matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance.
Case Study Research
Closing the academy–Business gap by building intellectual capital in professional formation
Commentary and Issues
Experts by Experience
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |