Does environmental regulation dividends inequality impact inclusive growth? Evidence from China
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22075426 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tao Ge (0000-0002-2105-5452, Nantong University), Ziqi Ding (0009-0005-7845-2503, Nantong University), Shuowan Lin (Nantong University), Yumeng Yang (0009-0009-1911-0780, Nantong University), Jianhua Ji (0000-0002-3669-4548, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Pages | 1061726-1061726 |
| Publication date | 2022-11-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1061726 |
| PMID | 36466484 |
| OpenAlex | W4309311888 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 67 |
Based on the panel data of 281 city level in China for the period of 2004–2016, this study uses the Cobb–Douglas production function to investigate the distribution of environmental regulation dividends and further adopts the threshold model to explore the impact of environmental regulation dividends inequality (ERDI) on inclusive growth (IG). Results indicate that the distribution structure of the environmental regulation dividends has improved, but the inequality between urban–rural residents is still apparent. Environmental regulation dividends inequality has a non-linear threshold effect on inclusive growth, which turns from a significant inhibition to a slight promotion after exceeding the threshold value. Grouping tests show that environmental regulation dividends inequality has a heterogeneous effect on cities with different resource endowments and leading industries and still inhibits inclusive growth of non-resource-based cities even if the inequality is higher than the threshold value. Mechanism analysis reveals that primary distribution and redistribution are the main channels through which environmental regulation dividends inequality inhibits and promotes inclusive growth when the inequality is below and above the threshold value, respectively. These conclusions have important implications for enhancing and distributing environmental regulation dividends to promote inclusive growth
China · Development economics · Dividend · Economics · Environmental regulation · Geography · Inequality · Natural resource economics · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Global Health Care Issues · Mathematics
Essay
Is There a Role for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation?
Dynamic panels with threshold effect and endogeneity
On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports
The Porter Hypothesis at 20
Absorptive capacity and green innovation adoption in SMEs
Environmental Regulation and U.S. Economic Growth
The impact of environmental regulations on industry productivity
Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries
Unequal Societies
Environmental cost–benefit analysis of alternative timing strategies in greenhouse gas abatement
Environmental taxation and the double dividend in decentralized jurisdictions
Is urbanization narrowing the urban-rural income gap? A cross-regional study of China
Human exposure, health hazards, and environmental regulations
Inclusive Growth in cities
Trade, Growth, and Poverty
The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |