Ready for Vaccination? Covid-19 Vaccination Willingness of Older People in Austria
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22076077 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lukas Richter (0000-0002-3304-3491, University of Applied Sciences St Pölten, corresponding author), Stephan Schreml (0000-0002-2820-1942, Vienna University of Economics and Business), Theresa Heidinger (0000-0002-8944-5537, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Pages | 859024-859024 |
| Publication date | 2022-06-03 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.859024 |
| PMID | 35719668 |
| OpenAlex | W4281994016 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 44 |
In spite of findings highlighting higher health risk from infection compared to younger people, a certain percentage of older people in Austria still lack a valid vaccination certificate. The current gaps in vaccination coverage in countries such as Austria are likely to be in large part due to vaccination refusal and pose or will pose problems for the health system and consequently for all of society should the initial findings on Omicron coronavirus infectivity prove true. Surprisingly, only a few studies around the globe explicitly address older people's COVID-19 vaccination willingness. The present work therefore intends to contribute to this field by identifying factors associated with the decision for or against a vaccination among the older population in Austria. Data collected between late 2020 and early 2021 via the cross-national panel study Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) are used to perform multinomial logistic regression to analyse differences between COVID-19 vaccination supporters, undecided persons and rejectors. The results show that persons exhibiting a low risk assessment toward COVID-19, less health protection behaviors, lower education and belonging to households with financial burdens are significantly more likely to refuse vaccination or be ambivalent. Although multimorbidity reduces risk of vaccination refusal, poor subjective health was significantly related to a higher risk of refusing vaccination. The results point to the importance of addressing the factors related to refusal. Only by understanding these factors will it be possible to increase vaccination rates and thus minimize other restrictive measures
Environmental health · Multinomial logistic regression · Population · Vaccination · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts · Demography · Medicine · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · Immunology
Accelerating the adoption of booster vaccine shots
Seasonal influenza vaccination uptake and digital literacy
Poverty in old age in times of Covid-19—Empirical results from Austria
How Technology, Health Information Seeking, and Socioeconomic Factors Are Associated With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination Readiness in Estonians Over 50 Years
Once we have it, will we use it? A European survey on willingness to be vaccinated against Covid-19
Vaccine hesitancy in the era of Covid-19
Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy—A Scoping Review of Literature in High-Income Countries
Parents’ and guardians’ views on the acceptability of a future Covid-19 vaccine
Covid ‐19 and Older Adults
Vaccination greatly reduces disease, disability, death and inequity worldwide
A global survey of potential acceptance of a Covid-19 vaccine
Transformation of the Independent Variables
Vaccine hesitancy
A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1
Predicting intention to receive Covid-19 vaccine among the general population using the health belief model and the theory of planned behavior model
Do conspiracy theory and mistrust undermine people's intention to receive the Covid‐19 vaccine in Austria
The structure of psychological well-being revisited
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |