The importance of community health workers as frontline responders during the Covid-19 pandemic, Somalia, 2020–2021
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22076094 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lilly M Nyagah (0000-0002-3852-6695, corresponding author), Sulaiman Bangura, Omar Abdulle Omar, Mary Joan Karanja (0000-0001-9521-5773), Mary Karanja, Mashrur Ahmed Mirza, Hossain Shajib, Haron Njiru (0000-0003-4341-4935), Kumlachew Mengistu, Sk Md Mamunur Rahman Malik (0000-0002-4691-492X) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Pages | 1215620-1215620 |
| Publication date | 2023-08-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1215620 |
| PMID | 37663863 |
| OpenAlex | W4385932411 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 25 |
Introduction We examined the contribution of community health workers as frontline responders for the community-based surveillance in Somalia during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic for detection of COVID-19 cases and identification of contacts. Methods We retrieved COVID-19 surveillance data from 16 March 2020 to 31 March 2021 from the health ministry’s central database. These data were collected through community health workers, health facilities or at the points of entry. We compared the number of suspected COVID-19 cases detected by the three surveillance systems and the proportion that tested positive using the chi-squared test. We used logistic regression analysis to assess association between COVID-19 infection and selected variables. Results During the study period, 154,004 suspected cases of COVID-19 were detected and tested, of which 10,182 (6.6%) were positive. Of the notified cases, 32.7% were identified through the community-based surveillance system, 54.0% through the facility-based surveillance system, and 13.2% at points of entry. The positivity rate of cases detected by the community health workers was higher than that among those detected at health facilities (8.6% versus 6.4%; p < 0.001). The community health workers also identified more contacts than those identified through the facility-based surveillance (13,279 versus 1,937; p < 0.001). The odds of COVID-19 detection generally increased by age. Community-based surveillance and health facility-based surveillance had similar odds of detecting COVID-19 cases compared with the points-of-entry surveillance (aOR: 7.0 (95% CI: 6.4, 7.8) and aOR: 7.5 (95% CI: 6.8, 8.3), respectively). Conclusion The community health workers proved their value as first responders to COVID-19. They can be effective in countries with weak health systems for targeted community surveillance in rural and remote areas which are not covered by the facility-based surveillance system
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Betacoronavirus · Coronavirus Infections · Disease · Outbreak · Pandemic · Pathology · Pneumonia · COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · Medicine · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research · Virology
Community Health Workers and Covid-19 — Addressing Social Determinants of Health in Times of Crisis and Beyond
Community health workers for universal health-care coverage
The value of community participation in disease surveillance
Community-based surveillance of infectious diseases
Community health workers for pandemic response
Comprehensive review of the evidence regarding the effectiveness of community–based primary health care in improving maternal, neonatal and child health
Community-based health care is an essential component of a resilient health system
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |