Assessing frailty in older adults
Discriminative properties of physical activity questionnaires
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 22077611 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Mert Doğan (0000-0001-7990-3365, Akdeniz University), Özge Erol Doğan (0000-0001-9007-7877, Ardahan University, autor correspondente), Fatma Ayvat (0000-0001-5692-4497, Hacettepe University), Ender Ayvat (0000-0002-7111-6495, Hacettepe University) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Páginas | 1702843-1702843 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-12-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Editora | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1702843 |
| PMID | 41426700 |
| OpenAlex | W4417018131 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 32 |
Introduction Frailty is prevalent among older adults and is a growing public health concern. Physical activity questionnaires are pragmatic tools for screening; however, their discriminative capacity remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine the discriminative performance and optimal cut-offs of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire–Short Form (IPAQ-SF) and the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) for identifying frailty states (non-frail, pre-frail, and frail) in a clinically derived cohort of older adults. Methods The study enrolled 289 older adults who were assessed using a demographic form, the FRAIL Scale, the IPAQ-SF, and the PASE. Frailty discrimination was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC); optimal thresholds were identified using the Youden index, diagnostic indices (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, predictive values) were computed, micro-/macro- area under the curves (AUC) were reported, and scale AUCs were compared using the DeLong test. Results Participants had a mean age of 72.5 ± 7.0 years, and 56.7% were women. Frailty prevalence was 31.1% non-frail, 29.4% pre-frail, and 39.4% frail. For IPAQ-SF, AUCs were 0.45 (non-frail), 0.40 (pre-frail), and 0.67 (frail); for PASE, AUCs were 0.39 (non-frail), 0.50 (pre-frail), and 0.65 (frail). Macro−/micro-AUCs were 0.51/0.53 for IPAQ-SF and 0.51/0.52 for PASE. No significant differences were found between the two instruments across the frailty categories (DeLong test, p > 0.05). At optimal cut-offs (IPAQ-SF ≤ 322.5; PASE ≤ 63.6), both questionnaires showed moderate agreement with the FRAIL Scale ( κ = 0.46–0.48), whereas agreement between the instruments was only low-to-moderate ( κ = 0.32, McNemar p = 0.015). Conclusion IPAQ-SF and PASE demonstrated limited ability to discriminate frailty status in older adults, with moderate accuracy in identifying frail individuals and poor discrimination between the non-frail and pre-frail groups. The IPAQ-SF showed slightly higher specificity, whereas the PASE demonstrated higher sensitivity, indicating that they capture distinct aspects of physical activity behavior but cannot be used interchangeably
Activities of daily living · Discriminative model · MEDLINE · Physical activity · Frailty in Older Adults · Nutrition and Health in Aging · Physical Activity and Health
Prevalence of Frailty in Middle-Aged and Older Community-Dwelling Europeans Living in 10 Countries
A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans
The Frailty Syndrome
The physical activity scale for the elderly (Pase)
Management of frailty
Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (Ipaq-SF)
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Frailty in Older Adults
Associations of physical activity participation trajectories with subsequent motor function declines and incident frailty
Association between frailty and the combination of physical activity level and sedentary behavior in older adults
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |