Can men’s violence reporting behavior be improved? Evidence from a couples-based cluster randomized controlled trial in Tanzania
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22077684 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nafisa Halim (0000-0002-6529-4455, Boston University, corresponding author), Neeta Ghanekar (Boston University), Ester Steven Mzilangwe (0009-0009-9890-4916, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences), Naomi Reich (World Education), Lilian Badi (World Education), Nandini Agarwal (0000-0002-9786-9970, Boston Medical Center, corresponding author), Lisa J Messersmith (0000-0003-4376-7968, Boston University), Lisa Messersmith |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Pages | 1460333-1460333 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1460333 |
| PMID | 41312251 |
| OpenAlex | W4416126373 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 22 |
Purpose Intimate partner violence (IPV) is challenging to measure due to underreporting by both men and women. The reasons why men fail to disclose their IPV perpetration in societies where such behavior is more socially accepted remain an open question. Men’s lack of awareness of how their behaviors can harm women is a contributing factor. We evaluated the impact of an intervention designed to increase men’s understanding of IPV on their ability to report it accurately, as indicated by men reporting IPV consistently with their female partners (whose reports are valid indicators of IPV). Methods We analyzed data from a cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in Tanzania. A total of 450 couples from nine villages were randomly assigned to one of three arms, with each arm comprising 150 couples. In Intervention Arm 1, men participated in peer groups that explored gender relations and IPV. In Intervention Arm 2, men participated in peer groups, and communities additionally engaged in dialogues on similar topics. The Control Arm had no such activities. IPV data were collected from both partners, following ethical guidelines to ensure women’s safety. Our primary outcome includes couples reporting concordantly whether IPV occurred (couples’ concordant reporting). Results From baseline to endline, concordant reporting among couples increased for physical (31%, p = 0.002), sexual (24%, p = 0.01), and economic (22%, p = 0.05) IPV in Intervention Arm 1, accompanied by fewer men disagreeing with their female partners’ IPV reports. Similarly, in Intervention Arm 2, concordant reporting increased for physical (24%, p = 0.02) and sexual (22%, p = 0.04) IPV. There was no improvement in the concordant reporting of emotional IPV across the arms. Compared to couples in the Control Arm, those in Intervention Arm 1 had higher odds of reporting concordantly on physical (OR: 1.85, 95% CI: 0.97, 3.51, p = 0.09) and economic (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 0.96, 3.46, p = 0.09) IPV at endline compared to baseline. Conclusion In communities that do not link IPV to fault, men may not report IPV because they do not recognize their behaviors as abuse. Including a preamble that defines IPV in a survey questionnaire can improve men’s reporting of IPV
Cluster randomised controlled trial · Occupational safety and health · Poison control · Randomized controlled trial · Suicide prevention · Tanzania · Child Abuse and Trauma · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
A systematic review and meta‐analysis of intimate partner violence during pregnancy and selected birth outcomes
Tip of the Iceberg
Women’s and men’s reports of past-year prevalence of intimate partner violence and rape and women’s risk factors for intimate partner violence
Gender differences in self-reports of intimate partner violence
Prevalence of intimate partner violence
Do Partners Agree about the Occurrence of Intimate Partner Violence
Scoping Review of Bidirectional Intimate Partner Violence Using Dyadic Data
Stigma, shame and women's limited agency in help-seeking for intimate partner violence
Help-seeking behaviors among survivors of intimate partner violence during pregnancy in 54 low- and middle-income countries
Concordance in the Reporting of Intimate Partner Violence among Male-Male Couples
Measuring Intrafamily Conflict and Violence
Spousal Disagreement in the Reporting of Physical Violence Against Wives in Southern Egypt
The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2)
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |