Influence of different caregiving styles on fundamental movement skills among children
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22078281 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jiahui Hu (0000-0002-6856-9899, Zhejiang Normal University), Shudan Zhang (Handan College), Weibing Ye (0000-0002-7352-5372, Zhejiang Normal University), Yuanye Zhu (0009-0007-9947-401X, Zhejiang Normal University), Huiling Zhou (0009-0003-9007-9284, Zhejiang Normal University), Lihua Lu (0000-0002-0492-5321, Jinhua University of Vocational Technology), Qian Chen (0000-0002-5249-7421, autor de correspondencia), Mallikarjuna Korivi (0000-0002-4038-1368, Zhejiang Normal University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 11 |
| Páginas | 1232551-1232551 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-11-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Editorial | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1232551 |
| PMID | 38094228 |
| OpenAlex | W4389093322 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 64 |
Purpose This study investigated the influence of parenting and grandparenting caregiving styles on fundamental motor skills (FMS) of preschool children. Method A total of 1,326 preschool children (698 boys, 628 girls) aged 4–6 years were recruited from the kindergartens of Jinhua City, China. Locomotor skills (LM), ball skills (BS), and total fundamental movement skills (TS) of children were assessed by the Test of Gross Motor Development-3rd edition (TGMD-3). Results There were 978 children in parenting and 348 children in grandparenting caregiving styles. The LM, BS and TS scores of children were considerably ( p < 0.001) increased with age (irrespective of sex or caregiving style). For the sex comparisons, BS scores of boys were significantly higher than girls ( p < 0.001), while LM and TS scores were not different between boys and girls. For the caregiving style comparison, parenting is superior to grandparenting in developing of children's FMS. Parenting boys of 4-, 5-, and 6-years old showed better BS compared to age-matched parenting girls, whereas boys of 5-years old in grandparenting only showed better BS compared to same-age grandparenting girls ( p < 0.05). Furthermore, parenting boys of 6-years reported higher LM ( p < 0.01), BS ( p < 0.001), and TS ( p < 0.001) scores compared to grandparenting boys, but girls' FMS at all ages were not significantly different between the caregiving styles. Conclusion Parenting caregiving style is positively associated with proper development of FMS among children. Girl children with poor FMS in grandparenting may need a special care or intervention programs to promote their FMS
Developmental psychology · Gross motor skill · Motor skill · Parenting styles · Children's Physical and Motor Development · Family and Disability Support Research · Infant Development and Preterm Care · Medicine · Psychology
Correlates of Gross Motor Competence in Children and Adolescents
Motor competence and health related physical fitness in youth
Parenting Styles
Parent Involvement and Children’s Academic and Social Development in Elementary School
Physical activity and depression, anxiety, and self-esteem in children and youth
Relationship of fundamental movement skills and physical activity in children and adolescents
A Little Autonomy Support Goes a Long Way
Autonomy vs. control
Fundamental Motor Skills of Children in Deprived Areas of England
Barriers and Facilitators to Physical Activity and FMS in Children Living in Deprived Areas in the UK
Grandparents Raising Grandchildren
Mastery of fundamental movement skills among 6-year-old Flemish pre-school children
The Health Implications of Grandparents Caring for Grandchildren in China
Gendered moral rationalities in later life
Current patterns of parental authority
Raising the Precious Single Child in Urban China-An Intergenerational Joint Mission Between Parents and Grandparents
Floating grandparents
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |