Psychometric validation and determination of minimal clinically important differences for the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in adolescents with myopia
Dados Bibliográficos
Background Myopic adolescents face multiple psychological challenges, including anxiety, depression, and social isolation, necessitating multidimensional assessment. One such assessment tool is the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), though it has not yet been validated in this specific population. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability, validity, responsiveness, and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the SDQ in this specific population. Methods Following the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) guidelines, we conducted a psychometric evaluation combining cross-sectional and longitudinal designs among 307 adolescents with myopia (including newly diagnosed and follow-up cases). Baseline assessments evaluated feasibility, reliability (internal consistency and test–retest stability), and validity (construct and discriminant validity). Follow-up surveys after myopia correction were used to assess responsiveness and establish the MCID using anchor-based methods. Results The SDQ demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.71) and good test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.73). Construct validity was supported by strong correlations between problem-related subscales (peer problems, hyperactivity/inattention, conduct problems, emotional problems) and difficulty scores ( r = 0.51–0.72, p < 0.001), with moderate-to-strong correlations for total SDQ scores ( r = 0.36–0.75, p < 0.001). Discriminant validity was confirmed by significant differences in prosocial behavior ( p < 0.01). While responsiveness was modest [effect size (ES) = −0.26, standardized response mean (SRM) = −0.28], the MCID was determined to range between 2.00–2.38 points, with a threshold of 2 points recommended for group-level discrimination. Conclusion The SDQ is a reliable and valid tool for assessing psychological well-being in adolescents with myopia. The established MCID of 2 points enhances its clinical utility for screening and monitoring mental health changes in this population
Clinical Practice · Mental health · Minimal clinically important difference · Psychometric testing · Psychometrics · Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire · Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies · Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies · Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample
Stress and adolescence
Prosocial Development
Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050
Coping with Chronic Illness in Childhood and Adolescence
Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement
Psychometric Properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha
The association between myopia and mental health among Chinese children in primary and secondary school
Cosmin guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures
Screening for disruptive behavior in adolescents at risk using the strengths and difficulties questionnaire
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |