Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Construction and evaluation of hourly average indoor PM2.5 concentration prediction models based on multiple types of places

Bibliographic Data

ID22078555
AuthorsYewen Shi (0000-0001-5688-267X, Shanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention), Zhiyuan Du (0009-0004-5341-2532, Fudan University), Jianghua Zhang (0000-0002-6734-3492, Shanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention), Fengchan Han (Shanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention), Feier Chen (0000-0002-3234-6896, Shanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention), Duo Wang (0000-0003-3954-7057, Shanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention), Mengshuang Liu (Shanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention), Hao Zhang (0000-0003-0232-5565, Fudan University), Chunyang Dong (Shanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention, corresponding author), Shaofeng Sui (0000-0002-8476-2410, Shanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume11
Pages1213453-1213453
Publication date2023-08-10
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2023.1213453
PMID37637795
OpenAlexW4385739896
LanguageEN
References cited56

Background People usually spend most of their time indoors, so indoor fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) concentrations are crucial for refining individual PM 2.5 exposure evaluation. The development of indoor PM 2.5 concentration prediction models is essential for the health risk assessment of PM 2.5 in epidemiological studies involving large populations. Methods In this study, based on the monitoring data of multiple types of places, the classical multiple linear regression (MLR) method and random forest regression (RFR) algorithm of machine learning were used to develop hourly average indoor PM 2.5 concentration prediction models. Indoor PM 2.5 concentration data, which included 11,712 records from five types of places, were obtained by on-site monitoring. Moreover, the potential predictor variable data were derived from outdoor monitoring stations and meteorological databases. A ten-fold cross-validation was conducted to examine the performance of all proposed models. Results The final predictor variables incorporated in the MLR model were outdoor PM 2.5 concentration, type of place, season, wind direction, surface wind speed, hour, precipitation, air pressure, and relative humidity. The ten-fold cross-validation results indicated that both models constructed had good predictive performance, with the determination coefficients (R 2 ) of RFR and MLR were 72.20 and 60.35%, respectively. Generally, the RFR model had better predictive performance than the MLR model (RFR model developed using the same predictor variables as the MLR model, R 2 = 71.86%). In terms of predictors, the importance results of predictor variables for both types of models suggested that outdoor PM 2.5 concentration, type of place, season, hour, wind direction, and surface wind speed were the most important predictor variables. Conclusion In this research, hourly average indoor PM 2.5 concentration prediction models based on multiple types of places were developed for the first time. Both the MLR and RFR models based on easily accessible indicators displayed promising predictive performance, in which the machine learning domain RFR model outperformed the classical MLR model, and this result suggests the potential application of RFR algorithms for indoor air pollutant concentration prediction

Geography · Linear regression · Machine learning · Meteorology · Predictive modelling · Random forest · Regression analysis · Relative humidity · Statistics · Variables · Wind speed · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting · Computer Science · Environmental Science · Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure · Mathematics

  • Relative Importance for Linear Regression in R

    Open Access•Ulrike Grömping•Journal of Statistical Software•2006

  • Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution

    Open Access•Aaron J Cohen, Michael Brauer et al.•The Lancet•2017

  • Random Forests for Classification in Ecology

    Open Access•D Richard Cutler, Thomas C Edwards et al.•Ecology•2007

  • Random Forests

    Open Access•Leo Breiman•Machine Learning•2001

  • Ambient PM2.5 and Annual Lung Cancer Incidence

    Open Access•Huagui Guo, Weifeng Li et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • The Usefulness of the Covid-GRAM Score in Predicting the Outcomes of Study Population with Covid-19

    Open Access•Agata Sebastian, Marcin Madziarski et al.•International Journal of…•2022

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae