The World Health Organization's Actions Within the United Nations System to Facilitate a Whole-of-Society Response to Covid-19 at Country Level

Datos Bibliográficos

ID22078714
AutoresGina Samaan (World Health Organization, autor de correspondencia), Michelle McPherson (0000-0003-2707-2138, World Health Organization), Johan Eidman (World Health Organization), Offeibea Obubah (World Health Organization), Jean-Pierre Baptiste (Mali-Folkecenter), Lianne Kuppens, Kai Von Harbou (0000-0002-0064-8611, World University of Bangladesh), Miftahul Fahmi Sembiring (World University of Bangladesh), Shambhu Acharya (World Health Organization), Peter Graaff (World Health Organization)
Año2022
Volumen9
Páginas831220-831220
Fecha de publicación2022-01-18
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
EditorialFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2021.831220
PMID35118047
OpenAlexW4206132328
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas7
Referencias citadas11

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic highlighted that managing health emergencies requires more than an effective health response, but that operationalizing a whole-of-society approach is challenging. The World Health Organization (WHO), as the lead agency for health within the United Nations (UN), led the UN response at the global level through the Crisis Management Team, and at the country level through the UN Country Teams (UNCTs) in accordance with its mandate. Three case studies—Mali, Cox's Bazar in Bangladesh, and Uzbekistan—provide examples of how WHO contributed to the whole-of-society response for COVID-19 at the country level. Interviews with WHO staff, supplemented by internal and external published reports, highlighted that the action of WHO comprised technical expertise to ensure an effective whole-of-society response and to minimize social disruption, including those affecting peacekeeping in Mali, livelihood sectors in Cox's Bazar, and the education sector in Uzbekistan. Leveraging local level volunteers from various sectors led to both a stronger public health response and the continuation of other sectoral work. Risk communication and community engagement (RCCE) emerged as a key theme for UN engagement at country level. These collective efforts of operationalizing whole-of-society response at the country level need to continue for the COVID-19 response, but also in preparedness for other health and non-health emergencies. Building resilience for future emergencies requires developing and exercising multi-sectoral preparedness plans and benefits from collective UN support to countries. Coronavirus disease had many impacts outside of health, and therefore emergency preparedness needs to occur outside of health too

Business · Disease · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Global health · International Health Regulations · Livelihood · Operationalization · Political science · Preparedness · Public health · Public relations · Disaster Response and Management · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Medicine · Nursing · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research