Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Perchloroethylene and Dry Cleaning

It's Time to Move the Industry to Safer Alternatives

Bibliographic Data

ID22079181
AuthorsDiana Ceballos (0000-0002-8789-2528, Boston University), Diana M Ceballos, Katie M Fellows (0000-0003-0115-6173, Waste Management (United States)), Ashley E Evans (Waste Management (United States)), Patricia Janulewicz (0000-0002-5299-4946, Boston University), Patricia A Janulewicz, Eun Gyung Lee (0000-0001-8773-3204, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health), Stephen G Whittaker (0000-0002-9588-0340, Waste Management (United States), corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume9
Pages638082-638082
Publication date2021-03-05
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2021.638082
PMID33748070
OpenAlexW3134382332
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited29

Perchloroethylene (PERC) is the most common solvent used for dry cleaning in the United States. PERC is a reproductive toxicant, neurotoxicant, potential human carcinogen, and a persistent environmental pollutant. The Environmental Protection Agency is evaluating PERC under the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act, which amended the Toxic Substances Control Act (amended TSCA), and has mandated that PERC dry cleaning machines be removed from residential buildings. Some local and state programs are also requiring or facilitating transitions to alternative cleaning technologies. However, the potential for these alternatives to harm human health and the environment is not well-understood. This review describes the issues surrounding the use of PERC and alternative solvents for dry cleaning while highlighting the lessons learned from a local government program that transitioned PERC dry cleaners to the safest current alternative: professional wet cleaning. Implications for future public health research and policy are discussed: (1) we must move away from PERC, (2) any transition must account for the economic instability and cultural aspects of the people who work in the industry, (3) legacy contamination must be addressed even after safer alternatives are adopted, and (4) evaluations of PERC alternatives are needed to determine their implications for the long-term health and sustainability of the people who work in the industry

Business · Computer security · Dry cleaning · Environmental planning · Harm · Political science · SAFER · Sustainability · Waste management · Wet cleaning · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Computer Science · Engineering · Environmental Science · Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure · Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact

  • Analysis of VOCs Emitted from Small Laundry Facilities

    Open Access•Da-Mee Eun, Yun-Sung Han et al.•International Journal of…•2022

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae