From 15 Minutes to 15 Seconds
How the Delta Variant Changed the Risk of Exposure to Covid-19. A Comparative Epidemiological Investigation Using Community Mobility Data From the Metropolitan Area of Genoa, Italy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22080294 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cristina Oliva (0000-0002-6772-8069, Kingston University), Giampiero Favato (0000-0003-3499-2979, Kingston University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Pages | 872698-872698 |
| Publication date | 2022-07-05 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.872698 |
| PMID | 35865252 |
| OpenAlex | W4283815707 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 32 |
The Delta variant became dominant during the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic due to its competitive advantage, the ability to reduce close contact duration from minutes to seconds, and, consequently, increase the risk of exposure to COVID-19. We used game theory to model the most effective public health response to this new threat. We compared the absolute and relative risk of exposure to COVID-19 before and after the emergence of the Delta variant. The absolute risk of exposure was defined as the product of crowding (people within a six feet distance) and visit duration. Our epidemiological investigation used aggregated and anonymized mobility data from Google Maps to estimate the visit duration for 808 premises in the metropolitan area of Genoa, Italy, in June 2021. The relative risk of exposure was obtained by dividing the risk of exposure of each activity by the lowest value (gas stations = 1). The median absolute risk of exposure to COVID-19 increased by sixty-fold in the first semester of 2021, while the relative risk did not significantly differ from the risk of exposure to the ancestral form of Covid-19 (5.9 in 2021 vs. 2.5 in 2021). The Delta variant represents an evolution of the game against COVID-19, but it is not a game-changer. The best response is to commit to our original strategy based on population-wide vaccination and social distancing. Unilateral deviations from the dominant strategy could offer COVID-19 a fighting chance against humanity
Absolute risk reduction · Confidence interval · Disease · Environmental health · Geography · Metropolitan area · Pandemic · Population · Relative risk · Social distance · Sociology · COVID-19 and Mental Health · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts · Demography · Medicine · Epidemiology · Internal Medicine
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis
Risk of Exposure to Covid-19
An Italian individual-level data study investigating on the association between air pollution exposure and Covid-19 severity in primary-care setting
Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide Covid-19 government interventions
Despite vaccination, China needs non-pharmaceutical interventions to prevent widespread outbreaks of Covid-19 in 2021
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |