Participatory development and proof-of-concept of a dyadic-based, AI-driven, just-in-time adaptive intervention mechanism for preventing anxiety and depressive disorders via app
Study protocol for a feasibility study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22080673 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anna‐Carlotta Zarski (0000-0002-0517-6668, Philipps University of Marburg, corresponding author), Theresa Sextl-Plötz (0009-0007-9690-8492, Philipps University of Marburg), Juliane Schmidt-Hantke (0000-0002-2292-1973, Philipps University of Marburg), Natalie Sarah Hess (Philipps University of Marburg), Claudia Buntrock (0000-0002-4974-5455, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Pages | 1626428-1626428 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-29 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1626428 |
| PMID | 40800021 |
| OpenAlex | W4412734058 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 79 |
Background The growing prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders highlights the need for transdiagnostic prevention through innovative interventions that outperform existing applications. By delivering personalized, context-sensitive support in moments of need, Just-In-Time-Adaptive-Interventions (JITAIs) have the potential to boost intervention relevance, engagement, and adherence. Aims The study aims to (1) develop a transdiagnostic dyadic, AI-based JITAI (DyAI-JITAI) app through a participatory process, and (2) evaluate its feasibility in terms of acceptability, usability, and preliminary intervention effects. Methods Stage I followed a participatory development process using focus groups, think-aloud tests, and qualitative interviews to explore expectations, ideas, and needs for a preventive DyAI-JITAI app among N = 28 target users with lived experience and potential users without clinical anxiety or depressive symptoms. Stage II involves a randomized-controlled proof-of-concept study ( N = 60) to test the DyAI-JITAI app’s acceptability and clinical usability. Adults without a clinical anxiety or depressive disorder will be randomized to the 4-week JITAI or waitlist control group. The CBT-based app features a seven-day learning phase with Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) and optional geo-tracking to identify optimal intervention times and locations, followed by AI-driven JITAIs using reinforcement learning. Users will receive optional motivational support from a self-chosen buddy with shared app access. Feasibility will be evaluated using a formal framework. Assessments will be conducted at four time points: screening, pre-intervention (prior to randomization), mid-intervention (10 days following randomization), and post-intervention (4 weeks following randomization), complemented by qualitative interviews on user perspectives of the DyAI-JITAI. Discussion This study aims to participatorily develop and assess the feasibility of a DyAI-JITAI app that bridges the intention-behavior gap by supporting CBT skill use in daily life and offering optional buddy-based motivation. The goal is to tailor the app to users’ needs and inform the design, procedures, and safety management of a future large-scale efficacy RCT
Anxiety · Human–computer interaction · mHealth · Psychiatry · Psychological intervention · Randomized controlled trial · Usability · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Clinical Psychology · Computer Science · Digital Mental Health Interventions · Medicine · Mental Health Research Topics · Psychology
Self-esteem in a broad-spectrum approach for mental health promotion
Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010
Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions (Jitais) in Mobile Health
What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies
Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions
Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument
A Systematic Review Assessing Bidirectionality between Sleep Disturbances, Anxiety, and Depression
Supportive Accountability
Mental Health Smartphone Apps
Clinical significance
The PHQ-9
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (Coreq)
Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale
Predicting Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using Smartphone and Wearable Data
Working mechanisms of the use and acceptability of ecological momentary interventions
Validation and Standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the General Population
Online synchronous focus group interviews
| Highly cited | No |
|---|