A co-design living labs philosophy of practice for end-to-end research design to translation with people with lived-experience of mental ill-health and carer/family and kinship groups
Dados Bibliográficos
There is increased recognition that people with lived-experience of mental ill-health ought to be centred in research design, implementation and translation, and quality improvement and program evaluation of services. There is also an increased focus on ways to ensure that co-design processes can be led by people with lived-experience of mental ill-health. Despite this, there remains limited explanation of the physical, social, human, and economic infrastructure needed to create and sustain such models in research and service settings. This is particularly pertinent for all health service sectors (across mental and physical health and social services) but more so across tertiary education settings where research generation occurs for implementation and translation activities with policy and services. The Co-Design Living Labs program was established in 2017 as an example of a community-based embedded approach to bring people living with trauma and mental ill-health and carers/family and kinship group members together with university-based researchers to drive end-to-end research design to translation in mental healthcare and research sectors. The program’s current membership is near to 2000 people. This study traces the evolution of the program in the context of the living labs tradition of open innovation. It overviews the philosophy of practice for working with people with lived-experience and carer/family and kinship group members—togetherness by design. Togetherness by design centres on an ethical relation of being-for that moves beyond unethical and transactional approaches of being-aside and being-with , as articulated by sociologist Zygmunt Bauman. The retrospective outlines how an initial researcher-driven model can evolve and transform to become one where people with lived-experience of mental ill-health and carer/family kinship group members hold clear decision-making roles, share in power to enact change, and move into co-researcher roles within research teams. Eight mechanisms are presented in the context of an explanatory theoretical model of change for co-design and coproduction, which are used to frame research co-design activities and provide space for continuous learning and evolution of the Co-Design Living Labs program
Kinship · Mental health · Political science · Psychiatry · Public relations · Sociology · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Service and Product Innovation · Technology Use by Older Adults
From diagnosis to dialogue – reconsidering the DSM as a conversation piece in mental health care
Living Labs in digital health
Developing a Research Agenda with Victim-Survivors to Improve Health Sector Responses to Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence in Australia
Communities of Practice and Living Labs
Adapting Experience‐Based Co‐Design to Disability Research
Co-Design as a Process of Joint Inquiry and Imagination
Experience-based design
A systematic review of living lab literature
Lost in the shadows
Indigenous systems knowledge applied to protocols for governance and inquiry
The Course of Recognition
The Core study—An adapted mental health experience codesign intervention to improve psychosocial recovery for people with severe mental illness
Close to the bench as well as at the bedside
Epistemic injustice and mental health research
Bringing user experience to healthcare improvement
Applying Elinor Ostrom’s Design Principles to Guide Co-Design in Health(care) Improvement
The Participatory Zeitgeist
Survivor research and Mad Studies
Epistemic justice as a condition of political freedom
Experiential Knowledge
Narrative Repair
Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding It Full
Debakarn Koorliny Wangkiny
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 5 |