Communicating risk during early phases of Covid-19
Comparing governing structures for emergency risk communication across four contexts
Bibliographic Data
Background: Emergency risk communication (ERC) is key to achieving compliance with public health measures during pandemics. Yet, the factors that facilitated ERC during COVID-19 have not been analyzed. We compare ERC in the early stages of the pandemic across four socio-economic settings to identify how risk communication can be improved in public health emergencies (PHE). Methods: To map and assess the content, process, actors, and context of ERC in Germany, Guinea, Nigeria, and Singapore, we performed a qualitative document review, and thematically analyzed semi-structured key informant interviews with 155 stakeholders involved in ERC at national and sub-national levels. We applied Walt and Gilson's health policy triangle as a framework to structure the results. Results: We identified distinct ERC strategies in each of the four countries. Various actors, including governmental leads, experts, and organizations with close contact to the public, collaborated closely to implement ERC strategies. Early integration of ERC into preparedness and response plans, lessons from previous experiences, existing structures and networks, and clear leadership were identified as crucial for ensuring message clarity, consistency, relevance, and an efficient use of resources. Areas of improvement primarily included two-way communication, community engagement, and monitoring and evaluation. Countries with recurrent experiences of pandemics appeared to be more prepared and equipped to implement ERC strategies. Conclusion: We found that considerable potential exists for countries to improve communication during public health emergencies, particularly in the areas of bilateral communication and community engagement as well as monitoring and evaluation. Building adaptive structures and maintaining long-term relationships with at-risk communities reportedly facilitated suitable communication. The findings suggest considerable potential and transferable learning opportunities exist between countries in the global north and countries in the global south with experience of managing outbreaks
CLARITY · Community engagement · Geography · Health communication · Pandemic · Political science · Preparedness · Public health · Public relations · Computer Science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Medicine · Nursing · Risk Perception and Management · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Responding to fluctuations in public and community trust and health seeking behaviour during the Covid-19 pandemic
Demand and satisfaction analysis of short health videos among Chinese urban youth
Risk communication to vulnerable populations on crimes in the Economic Community of West Africa
Enhancing two-way communication in disaster management in the EU—practical insights
Communication for Health
Risk Communication for Public Health Emergencies
A comparative analysis of experienced uncertainties in relation to risk communication during Covid19
Knowledge, attitude and perception of West Africans towards Covid-19
Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics
To Vaccinate or Not? The Role Played by Uncertainty Communication on Public Understanding and Behavior Regarding Covid-19
Reforming the health sector in developing countries
Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide Covid-19 government interventions
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2.5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |