Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Evaluating the implementation of the active life improving health behavior change program “BCP-Vamos” in primary health care

Protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial using the RE-AIM and CFIR frameworks

Bibliographic Data

ID22082917
AuthorsLisandra Maria Konrad (0000-0002-8863-4862, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, corresponding author), Constantino Gonçalves Ribeiro (0000-0003-0640-3110, Instituto Federal do Paraná), Cezar Grontowski Ribeiro, Elaine Cristina Maciel (0000-0003-0936-2473, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina), Camila Tomicki (0000-0002-3784-1570, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina), Fabiana A Brito (0000-0002-1262-4246, University of Nebraska Medical Center), Fabio A Almeida (0000-0002-2404-0694, University of Nebraska Medical Center), Tânia Rosane Bertoldo Benedetti (0000-0002-2035-5082, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina)
Year2022
Volume10
Pages726021-726021
Publication date2022-09-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2022.726021
PMID36172209
OpenAlexW4295269677
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited36

Introduction: The effective translation of evidence-based interventions has contributed to implementing actions that impact public policies and the population's health. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding the factors associated with the successful implementation of these interventions. The Active Life Improving Health Behavior Change Program (BCP-VAMOS) uses behavioral strategies to promote an active and healthy lifestyle in the community. Characterized as a health innovation, it also provides health professionals with online training to implement the program in Primary Health Care (PHC). Our study describes a pragmatic trial that aims to evaluate the implementation of BCP-VAMOS, version 3.0, in PHC in southern Brazil. Methods and analysis: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial (PRCT) of two arms comparing a group of PHC professionals who will participate in a traditional didactic approach (control group) vs. a group that will receive ongoing support (intervention group) for the implementation of BCP-VAMOS. The intervention will be available to adults (≥18 years old) registered at PHC. Program recipient's will be assessed at baseline and post-intervention (9 months after) to measure markers of physical activity and eating behavior (primary outcomes). Program's implementation process will be monitored for 12 months and will be evaluated using the RE-AIM and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) frameworks. Discussions: The survey findings can be used widely throughout Brazil, guiding the work of health professionals, service planners and policy-makers. Also, the results may help to inform the national health promotion policy to plan interventions and improve the implementation of programs in PHC. This research results will provide practical guidance for researchers to develop similar protocols to implement and adapt public health interventions. Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval has been granted by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Brazil, under no. 1394492. Results will be published in full as open access in the UFSC library and main trial results and associated papers in high-impact peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration number: RBR-2vw77q-Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials - ReBEC (http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br)

Alternative medicine · Health care · Implementation research · Political science · Primary health care · Psychological intervention · Randomized controlled trial · Computer Science · Health Education and Validation · Health Policy Implementation Science · Health, Nursing, Elderly Care · Medicine · Nursing

  • Health perceptions of older individuals on the cognitive benefits of a multicomponent green physical activity program

    Open Access•Carolina Rego Chaves Dias, Saulo Vasconcelos Rocha et al.•SSM - Mental Health•2025

  • Exploring the Safewards Programme to Reduce Restrictive Practices in Residential Aged Care

    Open Access•Suzanne Dawson, Candice Oster et al.•Health Expectations•2024

  • A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

    Open Access•M Alexis Kirk, Caitlin Kelley et al.•Implementation Science•2015

  • Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks

    Open Access•Phoebe Nilsen, Per Nilsen•Implementation Science•2015

  • SPIRIT 2013 Statement

    Open Access•An-Wen Chan, An‐Wen Chan et al.•Annals of Internal Medicine•2013

  • Implementation strategies

    Open Access•Enola K Proctor, Byron J Powell et al.•Implementation Science•2013

  • Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare

    Open Access•Alicia O’cathain, Elizabeth Croot et al.•BMJ Open•2019

  • RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework

    Open Access•Russell E Glasgow, Samantha M Harden et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2019

  • A refined compilation of implementation strategies

    Open Access•Byron J Powell, Thomas J Waltz et al.•Implementation Science•2015

  • The PRECIS-2 tool

    Open Access•Kirsty Loudon, Shaun Treweek et al.•BMJ•2015

  • Bridging Research and Practice

    Open Access•Rachel G Tabak, Rachel Tabak et al.•American Journal of Preventive…•2012

  • Taking account of context in population health intervention research

    Peter Craig, Erica Di Ruggiero et al.•2018

  • Implementation Intention and Action Planning Interventions in Health Contexts

    Open Access•Martin S Hagger, Aleksandra Luszczynska•Applied Psychology: Health and…•2014

  • Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice

    Open Access•Laura J Damschroder, David C Aron et al.•Implementation Science•2009

  • Planning for Implementation Success Using RE-AIM and CFIR Frameworks

    Open Access•Diane K King, Jo Ann Shoup et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2020

  • The Adaptome

    Open Access•David A Chambers, Wynne E Norton•American Journal of Preventive…•2016

  • Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions

    Russell E Glasgow, Thomas Vogt et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1999

  • Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis

    Open Access•Hsiu-Fang Hsieh, Sarah E Shannon•Qualitative Health Research•2005

  • Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies

    Open Access•Kirsti Malterud, Volkert Dirk Siersma et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2016

Unique citing works2
Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae