A qualitative study on the clinical safety and user experiences of female condoms for anal intercourse among men who have sex with men in Shanghai, China
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22084253 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jialu Huang (0000-0003-2267-8632, Dali University), Jia-Lu Huang, Xin Xin (0000-0003-0165-2417, Fudan University), Mingjun Ma (0000-0002-4741-9090, Dali University), Ming-Jun Ma, Zhen Ning (0000-0002-1319-9085, Shanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention), Shaotan Xiao (0009-0004-4792-8372, Fudan University, corresponding author), Shao-tan Xiao, Panpan Chen (0000-0002-0497-2654, Fudan University, corresponding author), Pan-pan Chen |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Pages | 1243891-1243891 |
| Publication date | 2023-11-23 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1243891 |
| PMID | 38074717 |
| OpenAlex | W4388942507 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 38 |
Objective: This qualitative study aimed to understand the clinical safety, efficacy, and receptiveness of using the female condom (FC) during anal intercourse among men who have sex with men (MSM). Methods: Subjects for this study were recruited from a two-group crossover trial among MSM in Shanghai. The trial consisted of two phases, each including the use of condoms (FC vs. male condom), questionnaires, and in-depth one-on-one interviews. The two phases were separated by a washout period of 4 weeks. The minimum sample size for this study was determined in accordance with the principle of "information saturation." The qualitative data were organized and analyzed using ATLAS.ti version 7. Results: A total of 26 participants from the MSM population were recruited for this study, with 10 assuming the insertive role (i.e., "1"), 8 assuming the receptive role (i.e., "0"), and 8 being versatile (i.e., "0.5"). Each participant completed the crossover trial comprising two phases. The cumulative usage of FCs and male condoms (MCs) amounted to 115 and 127 times, respectively. During the reported sexual encounters, no participants reported incidents of condom rupture, slippage, or other malfunctions. A few participants reported experiencing slight chafing pain, primarily put forward by "0" participants. Apart from those reports, no instances of bleeding, swelling, or allergic reactions were reported. The efficiency of FC in disease prevention, the sexual partner's willingness to use FC, the freshness of FC, and positive sexual experiences were the main reasons for the consistent use of FC for anal sex. Discomfort and pain during sexual activity, the loose design and thick material of FCs, and difficulties in placing FCs were the major obstacles to FC use among MSM. The elements referring to the forehead exhibited varied in importance among "1,", "0," and "0.5" participants. Regarding the willingness to use the FC in the future anal intercourse, 61.54% of participants expressed a positive inclination, 23.08% were uncertain, and 15.38% stated that they would not. "A better sense of security during anal sex" was the main factor affecting willingness among "0" participants and "the sexual pleasure that the FC brought" among "1" participants. Improving the design and technology of FCs and increasing the frequency of use and practice might improve the use skills, which will favor the willingness to use FCs among the MSM population. Conclusion: FCs received positive user feedback from study participants, but distinctions were found in individuals in different sexual roles. Large-scale quantitative studies are needed to evaluate the clinical safety of the FC and its effectiveness in preventing the transmission of STDs during anal intercourse
Condom · Environmental health · Family medicine · Female condom · Gynecology · Men who have sex with men · Population · Qualitative research · Syphilis · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Demography · HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions · Medicine · Reproductive tract infections research
HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)
HIV Prevalence and Associated Risks in Young Men Who Have Sex With Men
Content analysis and thematic analysis
Introducing Female Condoms to Female Sex Workers in Central America
Lifetime Prevalence and Correlates of Female Condom Use for Anal Sex in a Geographically Diverse Sample of Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in the United States
Anal use of the female condom
The new female condom (FC2) in Uganda
What has changed HIV and syphilis infection among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Southwest China
Towards condom skills
The Impact of Information About the Female Condom on Female Condom Use Among Males and Females from a US Urban Community
Inconsistencies on U.S. Departments of Health Websites Regarding Anal Use of the Female Condom
Off-Label Use of the Female Condom for Anal Intercourse Among Men in New York City
Use of reality "female condoms" for anal sex by US men who have sex with men. Hivnet Vaccine Preparedness Study Protocol Team
It's a Different Condom, Let's See How It Works”
Confusing Categories and Themes
Female condom acceptability in urban India
| Highly cited | No |
|---|