Scaling holistic e-health solutions in cancer care using a qualitative realist framework
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22085249 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Samar J Melhem (0000-0003-0967-0871, University of Jordan, corresponding author), Shereen Nabhani‐Gebara (0000-0002-5784-4779, Kingston University), Shereen Nabhani-Gebara, Nailya Bulatova (University of Jordan), Ibrahim Alabbadi (University of Jordan), Hamzeh Almomani (0000-0002-4537-5477, University of Jordan), Rimal Mousa (0000-0002-1788-0281, University of Jordan), Ahmed Almousa (University of Jordan), Yazan AlRashdan (University of Jordan), Omar Nimri (0000-0002-6257-7134, Ministry of Health), Reem Kayyali (0000-0002-7300-8738, Kingston University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Pages | 1617857-1617857 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1617857 |
| PMID | 41415251 |
| OpenAlex | W4416935945 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 35 |
Background: While e-health innovations have advanced cancer-care delivery in high-income countries, middle-income countries (MICs) face distinct systemic, infrastructural, and sociocultural challenges in adopting and scaling digital-health interventions. There is a growing imperative to explore how holistic digital platforms can be implemented effectively in oncology within resource-constrained settings. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the barriers and facilitators influencing the scalability and adoption of a comprehensive e-health solution in cancer care, drawing on a realist paradigm to determine what works, for whom, and under which circumstances, in the context of Jordan. Methods: A qualitative study, underpinned by a realist paradigm, was conducted using in-depth, semi-structured interviews with oncology healthcare professionals from diverse clinical settings in Jordan. Interviews were conducted in Arabic, translated into English, and analyzed using a hybrid inductive-deductive framework approach. The Implementation of Change Model guided interpretation of the findings, enabling the identification of multi-level contextual influences. Results: -comprising six deductive subthemes derived from the Implementation of Change Model: (A) Innovation; (B) Patients; (C) Healthcare professionals; (D) Organizational context; (E) Social context; and (F) Economic and political context. Across these subthemes, interpretive codes were classified as barriers or facilitators. Participants emphasized the necessity of assessing e-health readiness prior to implementation, and the importance of integrated, cross-sectoral approaches to support scalable, sustainable solutions. Conclusion: This study provides novel, contextually grounded insights into the implementation dynamics of digital transformation in oncology within MICs. It offers actionable guidance for policymakers and system designers aiming to foster sustainable, equitable digital-health ecosystems
Cancer · Digital health · Grounded theory · Health care · Qualitative research · Digital Mental Health Interventions · Mobile Health and mHealth Applications · Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
A checklist for identifying determinants of practice
Snowball Sampling
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (Coreq)
Opening the government’s black boxes
A realist approach to thematic analysis
Transparency and the Black Box Problem
Digital Trends, Digital Literacy, and E-Health Engagement Predictors of Breast and Colorectal Cancer Survivors
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research
Barriers and facilitators to health information exchange in low- and middle-income country settings
Sampling in Qualitative Research
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |