Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Development and validation of a predictive model for chronic pain after thoracoscopic pulmonary resection

Bibliographic Data

ID22085331
AuthorsYue Shang (0009-0008-2341-9820, Tang Du Hospital), Chenyang Wang (0000-0003-2788-0346, Yan'an University), Jiameng Wang (0000-0003-2649-4996, Department of Anesthesiology, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University), Yi-Xiang Wang (0000-0001-5697-0717, Tang Du Hospital), Wenlun Zhong (Xi'an Medical University), Changjun Gao (0000-0002-5860-6596, Tang Du Hospital, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume14
Pages1787875-1787875
Publication date2026-06-19
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2026.1787875
PMID42404940
OpenAlexW7165175770
LanguageEN
References cited25

Background Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is a major complication following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung resection. Despite its clinical importance, the reported incidence of CPSP varies considerably across studies, and a standardized tool for risk prediction remains lacking. This study aimed to identify predictors associated with CPSP after VATS lung resection within a single-center prospective observational cohort and to develop predictive models to guide personalized analgesic strategies. Methods Clinical data were analyzed from patients who underwent thoracoscopic pulmonary resection at Tangdu Hospital between August 2024 and July 2025. Eligible patients were randomly allocated into a training cohort (80%) for model development and an internal validation cohort (20%) for model validation. Acute pain was assessed using the highest Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score recorded within 72 h postoperatively, while CPSP was evaluated at 3 months after surgery. Patients were dichotomized based on the presence of CPSP into the CPSP group and the non-CPSP group. Variables with a P -value <0.1 in univariate analysis were entered into multivariate logistic regression to establish a prediction model for CPSP using R software. Results A total of 744 patients were included in this study, with 595 assigned to the training set and 149 to the validation set. Among all patients, 284 (38.1%) developed CPSP. The incidence rates in the training and validation cohorts were 37.8 and 36.9%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression identified gender, postoperative acute pain, postoperative pneumonia, duration of chest tube drainage, and opioid rescue dose (in morphine milligram equivalents) as independent predictors associated with CPSP. The nomogram model constructed based on these predictors demonstrated good performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.880 (95% CI: 0.850–0.910). Calibration curve analysis confirmed the high predictive accuracy of the model (Hosmer–Lemeshow test, P = 0.737), and decision curve analysis indicated a significant clinical net benefit. Furthermore, in the validation cohort, the model maintained good discriminative ability (AUC = 0.829) and calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow test, P = 0.765), enabling reliable individualized risk prediction. Conclusions CPSP remains highly prevalent after thoracoscopic pulmonary resection

Analgesic · Chronic pain · Cohort · Cohort study · Complication · Logistic regression · Nomogram · Prospective cohort study · Univariate analysis · Anesthesia and Pain Management · Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment · Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases

  • Global cancer statistics 2022

    Open Access•Francesca Bray, Mathieu Laversanne et al.•CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians•2024

  • The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain

    Srinivasa N Raja, Daniel B Carr et al.•Pain•2020

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae