Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Development and initial validation of questionnaire on predictors for the use of hearing protection devices among noise exposed manufacturing workers in Tanzania

A methodological study

Datos Bibliográficos

ID22085484
AutoresIsrael Paul Nyarubeli (0000-0003-1506-0076, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences), Alexander Mtemi Tungu (0000-0001-7823-4809, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences), Ståle Pallesen (0000-0002-5831-0840, University of Bergen), Bente E Moen (0000-0002-0435-3124, University of Bergen, autor de correspondencia), Simon Henry Mamuya (Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences), Simon Henry David Mamuya
Año2023
Volumen11
Páginas1102343-1102343
Fecha de publicación2023-02-09
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
EditorialFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2023.1102343
PMID36844814
OpenAlexW4319765569
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas53

Introduction: The use of hearing protection devices (HPDs) has been an intervention of choice in many workplaces such as in the construction industry for quite some time due to impractical effects of engineering and administrative interventions. Questionnaires for assessment for HPDs use among construction workers have been developed and validated in developed countries. However, there is limited knowledge of the same, among manufacturing workers in developing countries that are assumed to have a different culture, work organizations and production processes. Methods: We conducted a stepwise methodological study to develop a questionnaire to predict the use of HPDs among noise exposed workers in manufacturing factories in Tanzania. The questionnaire included 24 items and was developed through rigorous and systematic procedures involving three steps; (i) item formulation that involved two experts, (ii) expert content review and item rating that involving eight experts with vast experience in the field, and (iii) a field pre-test that involved 30 randomly selected workers from a factory with similar characteristics as a planned study site. A modified Pender's Health Promotion Model was adopted in the questionnaire development. We analyzed the questionnaire in terms of content validity and item reliability. Results: The 24 items were categorized into seven domains i.e., perceived self-efficacy, perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, interpersonal influences, situational influences and safety climate. The score for content validity for each item was satisfactory as the content validity index ranged between 0.75 to 1.00 for clarity, relevance, and essentiality criteria. Similarly, the scores for the content validity ratio (for all items) were 0.93, 0.88 and 0.93 for clarity, relevance, and essentiality, respectively. In addition, the overall value for Cronbach's alpha was 0.92 with domain coefficients: perceived self-efficacy 0.75; perceived susceptibility 0.74; perceived benefits 0.86; perceived barriers 0.82; interpersonal influences 0.79; situational influences; 0.70; and safety climate 0.79. The mean inter-item correlation was 0.49 suggesting good internal consistency. Discussion and conclusion: The developed and preliminary validated questionnaire can be used to predict the HPDs use among noise exposed manufacturing factory workers. Future surveys using this questionnaires warranted for further validation of the scale developed

CLARITY · Construct validity · Content validity · Occupational safety and health · Psychological intervention · Psychometrics · Applied Psychology · Clinical Psychology · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics · Medicine · Noise Effects and Management · Nursing · Psychology

  • Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches

    Open Access•Oladimeji Akeem Bolarinwa, OladimejiAkeem Bolarinwa•Nigerian Postgraduate Medical…•2015

  • Likert Scale

    Ankur Joshi, Saket Kale et al.•British Journal of Applied…•2015

  • Design and Implementation Content Validity Study

    Open Access•Vahid Zamanzadeh, Akram Ghahramanian et al.•Journal of Caring Sciences•2015

  • Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine

    Open Access•Siny Tsang, Colin Royse et al.•Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia•2017

  • Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations

    Open Access•Denise F Polit, Cheryl Tatano Beck et al.•Research in Nursing & Health•2007

  • Inter-item Correlations

    Ralph L Piedmont•Encyclopedia of Quality of Life…•2014

  • Determination and Quantification Of Content Validity

    Mary R Lynn•Nursing Research•1986

  • Constructing validity

    Lesley A Clark, Lee Anna Clark et al.•Psychological Assessment•1995

  • Making sense of Cronbach's alpha

    Open Access•Mohsen Tavakol, Reg Dennick•International Journal of Medical…•2011

  • A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity 1

    Open Access•C H Lawshe•Personnel Psychology•1975

  • Prevalence of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Among Tanzanian Iron and Steel Workers

    Open Access•Israel Paul Nyarubeli, Alexander Mtemi Tungu et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • Towards a Holistic Model Explaining Hearing Protection Device Use among Workers

    Open Access•Olivier Doutres, Jonathan Terroir et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Development and initial validation of the Chinese Version of the Noise Exposure Questionnaire (C-NEQ)

    Open Access•Kun Han, Qixuan Wang et al.•BMC Public Health•2022

  • Sample size for pre-tests of questionnaires

    Open Access•Thomas V Perneger, Thomas Perneger et al.•Quality of Life Research•2014

  • Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests

    Open Access•Lee J Cronbach•Psychometrika•1951

  • An Examination of Questionnaire Evaluation by Expert Reviewers

    Open Access•K Olson•CAM•2010

  • Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research

    Open Access•Godfred O Boateng, Torsten B Neilands et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2018

  • A systematic approach for accurate translation of instruments

    Open Access•Ghazwan Toma, Timoty C Guetterman et al.•Methodological Innovations•2017

  • Construct validity in psychological tests

    Lee J Cronbach, Paul E Meehl•Psychological Bulletin•1955

  • Scale development

    Open Access•Fabiane Frota Da Rocha Morgado, Juliana F F Meireles et al.•Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica•2018

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae