Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Clinical, Epidemiologic and Ethical Aspects of Hysterectomy in Young Females With Intellectual Disability

A Multi-Centre Study of Public Hospitals in Mexico City

Datos Bibliográficos

ID22085527
AutoresHoracio Márquez-González (0000-0001-9041-5813, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez), Edith Valdez-Martínez (0000-0003-2730-7005, Mexican Social Security Institute, autor de correspondencia), Miguel Bedolla (Northwest Vista College)
Año2021
Volumen9
Páginas746399-746399
Fecha de publicación2021-11-18
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
EditorialFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2021.746399
PMID34869162
OpenAlexW3212318393
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas8

Background: Non-therapeutic hysterectomy has been performed to this day in Mexican women with intellectual disabilities (IDs), but the rationale for performing the procedure has been rarely submitted to clinical ethics committees. The objectives of the present research were to determine the frequency of hysterectomy and the clinical and epidemiologic characteristics that associated to the indication of hysterectomy in girls and young females with IDs and to analyse the emerging ethical issues related to the procedure. Materials and Methods: A medical chart review was conducted to identify female patients aged ≤ 25 years who had IDs based on anatomical pathologies and hospital records and underwent hysterectomy between January 2014 and December 2019 in nine high-concentration hospitals in Mexico City. Data were collected using a questionnaire developed ex professo and validated through a pilot study and analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 21.0 software. Results: Information of 234 female patients with or without ID who were ≤ 25 years of age was reported by the departments of anatomical pathology and paediatrics. Of the patients, 184 (79%) were excluded because the information reported was found to be erroneous or incomplete during the medical records review. Most of the 50 emales included in the study had moderate ID ( n = 23, 46%) followed by those with severe ID ( n = 17, 34%). The mean age at hysterectomy was 15 ± 2.9 years. Prophylactic-total abdominal hysterectomy was the most frequently performed ( n = 42, 84%). A concurrence was observed between the parental and medical reasons justifying hysterectomy. The most frequent reasons were fertility control (parents vs. physicians: 46 vs. 42%), management of menstrual hygiene (28 vs. 30%) and risk of sexual abuse (6 vs. 6%). Conclusion: This study showed that performing non-therapeutic hysterectomy is subject to the clinical judgement of physicians according to their perception of the patient's quality of life. Therefore, the ethical quality of the decision to perform the procedure in girls and young females resides in the ethical value of its consequences

Abdominal hysterectomy · Family medicine · General surgery · Gynecology · Hysterectomy · Intellectual disability · Medical record · Pathology · Psychiatry · Disability Rights and Representation · Medicine · Epidemiology · Pediatrics · Surgery

  • Pain, shame, blood, and doctors

    Open Access•Jackie Rodgers•Women s Studies International Forum•2001

  • Considering Culture in Physician- Patient Communication During Colorectal Cancer Screening

    Open Access•Ge Gao, Nancy J Burke et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2009

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae