Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Development and validation of the short form of the Parker personality measure among Chinese college students

Bibliographic Data

ID22086695
AuthorsYihua Zhang (0000-0002-2939-5187, Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University), Jing Huang (0000-0002-6205-0025, Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University), Yangjie Chen (Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University), Jiale Xu (0000-0001-5751-7754, Hangzhou Normal University), Runtang Meng (0000-0002-5826-5576, Hangzhou Normal University, corresponding author), Bingren Zhang (0000-0002-0372-4640, Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume13
Pages1685858-1685858
Publication date2025-11-13
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2025.1685858
PMID41323593
OpenAlexW4416159834
LanguageEN
References cited79

Objective: Current diagnostic frameworks for pathological personality are shifting from categorical to dimensional models. While the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 represents the most extensively validated dimensional measure across Western and Eastern cultures, its length limits practical utility. This study developed the Parker Personality Measure Short Form (PERM-SF) to facilitate efficient screening of pathological personality traits. Methods: = 1,614; 887 women and 727 men, aged 20.38 years ± 1.59, 17-27 years) were recruited consecutively from one university in China through online random sampling. Exploratory factor analysis in Sample 1 identified items with robust psychometric properties for inclusion in the PERM-SF. Confirmatory factor analysis in Sample 2 validated the factor structure. Subsequent analyses evaluated internal consistency, longitudinal measurement invariance, and construct validity. Results: Thirty-eight of the 92 items of PERM were deleted due to low factor loadings or high cross loadings, resulting in a five-factor model consisting of 54 items (F1: Dissociality, F2: Self-doubt-Detachment, F3: Disinhibition-Negative affectivity, F4: Anankastia, F5: Borderline pattern). All factors demonstrated good internal consistency (McDonald's ω = 0.834-0.932). Longitudinal measurement invariance held at strict level (ΔCFI ≤ 0.001, ΔRMSEA ≤ 0.001) and two-way random-effects ICCs ranged from 0.488 to 0.759. Validity analyses revealed significant weak-to-moderate correlations with the Symptom Checklist-90 and established discriminant validity for all factor pairs, as supported by the Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio test. Conclusion: The PERM-SF exhibits adequate preliminary psychometric properties for rapid assessment of pathological personality dimensions, supporting its utility for research and screening applications at least among Chinese young adults

16PF Questionnaire · Big Five personality traits · Personality · Personality Assessment Inventory · Personality test · Psychometrics · Short Forms · Personality Disorders and Psychopathology · Personality Traits and Psychology · Psychological Testing and Assessment

  • A Cultural Approach to Emotional Disorders

    E Deidre Pribram•Cultural Approach to Emotional…•2016

  • Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance.

    Adam W Meade, Emily Johnson et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2008

  • The Cosmin study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes

    Open Access•Lidwine B Mokkink, Caroline B Terwee et al.•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•2010

  • Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items

    Jessica Maples, Jessica L Maples et al.•Psychological Assessment•2015

  • Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis.

    Marieke E Timmerman, Urbano Lorenzo‐Seva•Psychological Methods•2011

  • Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5

    Open Access•Robert F Krueger, Jaime Derringer et al.•Psychological Medicine•2012

  • Suppression and interpersonal harmony

    Meifen Wei, Jenny C Su et al.•Journal of Counseling Psychology•2013

  • A Psychometric Toolbox for Testing Validity and Reliability

    Open Access•Holli A Devon, Michelle E Block et al.•Journal of Nursing Scholarship•2007

  • Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology.

    Domenic V Cicchetti•Psychological Assessment•1994

  • Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance

    Gordon W Cheung, Roger B Rensvold•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2002

  • Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance

    Fangfang Chen, Fang Fang Chen•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2007

  • Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis

    Li‐tze Hu, Peter M Bentler•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•1999

  • A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling

    Open Access•Jörg Henseler, Christian M Ringle et al.•Journal of the Academy of…•2015

  • Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.

    Frank J Floyd, Keith F Widaman•Psychological Assessment•1995

  • A Scaled Difference Chi-Square Test Statistic for Moment Structure Analysis

    Open Access•Albert Satorra, Peter M Bentler•Psychometrika•2001

  • Cyberbullying among college students in a Chinese population

    Open Access•Xingyue Jin, Kun Zhang et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • Cultural and gender differences in social anxiety

    Open Access•Kristen E Zentner, Hajin Lee et al.•Current Psychology•2023

  • The relationship between religion and health-related behaviours in patients with borderline personality disorder

    Saira Khan, Saira H Khan et al.•Mental Health Religion & Culture•2019

  • The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form (PID-5-SF)

    Open Access•Jens C Thimm, Stian Jordan et al.•BMC Psychology•2016

  • Anankastia or Psychoticism? Which One Is Better Suited for the Fifth Trait in the Pathological Big Five

    Open Access•Włodzimierz Strus, Patryk Łakuta et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2021

  • Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in China

    Open Access•Shulin Fang, Zirong Ouyang et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2021

  • Cosmin guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures

    Open Access•C A C Prinsen, Lidwine B Mokkink et al.•Quality of Life Research•2018

  • Up- and Down-Regulation of Daily Emotion

    Open Access•Xinmei Deng, Biao Sang et al.•Psychological Reports•2013

  • Social anxiety among East Asians in North America

    Lorena Hsu, Sheila R Woody et al.•Cultural Diversity & Ethnic…•2012

  • Choosing Between Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha, McDonald’s Coefficient Omega, and Coefficient H

    Michael T Kalkbrenner•Measurement and Evaluation in…•2024

  • Revising the personality disorder diagnostic criteria for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth Edition (DSM-V)

    Steve Balsis, Daniel L Segal et al.•American Journal of Orthopsychiatry•2009

  • Chinese Relationalism

    Open Access•K K Hwang, Kwang‐Kuo Hwang•Journal for the Theory of Social…•2000

  • From alpha to omega

    Open Access•Thomas J Dunn, Thom Baguley et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2014

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae