Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Health economic analysis of the integrated cognitive assessment tool to aid dementia diagnosis in the United Kingdom

Bibliographic Data

ID22088337
AuthorsJudith Shore (0000-0002-5785-5937, Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust), Chris Kalafatis (0000-0002-7171-5391, King's College London), Angela Stainthorpe (0000-0002-2531-9371, Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust), Mohammad Hadi Modarres (0000-0002-9579-7942), Seyed‐Mahdi Khaligh‐Razavi (0000-0002-5700-1704, Royan Institute, corresponding author), Seyed-Mahdi Khaligh-Razavi
Year2023
Volume11
Pages1240901-1240901
Publication date2023-09-29
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2023.1240901
PMID37841740
OpenAlexW4387186898
LanguageEN
References cited35

Objectives The aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive economic evaluation of the integrated cognitive assessment (ICA) tool compared with standard cognitive tests when used for dementia screening in primary care and for initial patient triage in memory clinics. Methods ICA was compared with standard of care comprising a mixture of cognitive assessment tools over a lifetime horizon and employing the UK health and social care perspective. The model combined a decision tree to capture the initial outcomes of the cognitive testing with a Markov structure that estimated long-term outcomes of people with dementia. Quality of life outcomes were quantified using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the economic benefits were assessed using net monetary benefit (NMB). Both costs and QALYs were discounted at 3.5% per annum and cost-effectiveness was assessed using a threshold of £20,000 per QALY gained. Results ICA dominated standard cognitive assessment tools in both the primary care and memory clinic settings. Introduction of the ICA tool was estimated to result in a lifetime cost saving of approximately £123 and £226 per person in primary care and memory clinics, respectively. QALY gains associated with early diagnosis were modest (0.0016 in primary care and 0.0027 in memory clinic). The net monetary benefit (NMB) of ICA introduction was estimated at £154 in primary care and £281 in the memory clinic settings. Conclusion Introduction of ICA as a tool to screen primary care patients for dementia and perform initial triage in memory clinics could be cost saving to the UK public health and social care payer

Cognition · Data science · Dementia · Disease · Pathology · Psychiatry · Computer Science · Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research · Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders · Medicine · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Gerontology

  • Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050

    Open Access•Emma Nichols, Jaimie D Steinmetz et al.•The Lancet Public Health•2022

  • Cognitive screening test in primary care

    Open Access•Juliana Emy Yokomizo, Katrin Seeher et al.•Revista de Saúde Pública•2018

  • Validity and Cultural Generalisability of a 5-Minute AI-Based, Computerised Cognitive Assessment in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Dementia

    Open Access•Chris Kalafatis, Mohammad Hadi Modarres et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2021

  • The use of the EQ-5D as a measure of health-related quality of life in people with dementia and their carers

    Open Access•Vasiliki Orgeta, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards et al.•Quality of Life Research•2014

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae