NIH-supported implementation science and nutrition research
A portfolio review of the past decade
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22088438 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Susan Vorkoper (0000-0002-6368-9111, National Institutes of Health, corresponding author), Ariella R Korn (0000-0001-7227-7365, National Institutes of Health), Padma Maruvada (0000-0002-8907-2056, National Institutes of Health), Holly L Nicastro (0000-0001-6150-8113, National Institutes of Health), Scarlet Shi (National Institutes of Health) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Pages | 1235164-1235164 |
| Publication date | 2023-10-17 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1235164 |
| PMID | 37915813 |
| OpenAlex | W4387704585 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 18 |
Objective: This portfolio analysis aims to describe the scope of NIH-funded extramural research grants at the intersection of nutrition research and implementation science (IS) from 2011 to 2022 and to offer insights into future research opportunities relevant to the Strategic Plan for NIH Nutrition Research 2020-2030. Methods: A portfolio analysis of funded grants using NIH reporting systems was conducted to identify nutrition research and IS awarded between fiscal years 2011 and 2022. The authors screened the titles and abstracts for inclusion criteria: research and career development awards involved a nutrition and/or dietary intervention and measured a stated implementation outcome or used an IS theory, model, or framework. Results: In total, 33 NIH-funded awards met the inclusion criteria. Almost half of the awards (48.5%) were investigator-initiated research projects compared to research career awards and cooperative agreements. While studies were predominantly conducted in the United States, 15.2% were conducted in low- and middle-income countries in Africa, Latin America, and Asia. Adults aged 19-64 years and children aged 2-11 years represented most of the study populations (45.5 and 15.2%, respectively). Studies provided nutrition/dietary guidelines and created culturally tailored interventions, which were then adapted in collaboration with community partners in schools, hospitals, and religious settings. The most cited IS outcomes were feasibility, costs, adoption, and acceptability. Sixteen awards (48.5%) used an IS theory, model, or framework to guide their work. Discussion: The findings show the breadth of NIH-funded nutrition and implementation research and highlight potential research opportunities
Business · Data science · Portfolio · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Computer Science · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine
Implementation Research in Mental Health Services
Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity
Food Insecurity, Neighborhood Food Environment, and Health Disparities
Comparing, Contrasting, and Integrating Dissemination and Implementation Outcomes Included in the RE-AIM and Implementation Outcomes Frameworks
An Extension of RE-AIM to Enhance Sustainability
Conceptual framework of equity-focused implementation research for health programs (EquIR)
A Framework for Increasing Equity Impact in Obesity Prevention
Effectiveness-implementation Hybrid Designs
| Highly cited | No |
|---|