Women’s experiences and perspectives on a nurse navigation program for cervical cancer screening
A qualitative study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22088642 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Turkan Ozdas (Fenerbahce University), Elif Dönmez (0000-0001-5030-3411, University of Health Sciences Antigua), Tülay Ortabağ (0000-0003-1466-7343, University of Health Sciences Antigua) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1883702 |
| OpenAlex | W7166882245 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 57 |
Background Cervical cancer remains an important public health problem despite the availability of effective screening and prevention strategies. Psychosocial, individual, and health system-related barriers continue to limit women’s participation in cervical cancer screening programs. Recent approaches increasingly emphasize the role of nurse navigation, digital health technologies, media communication, and HPV self-sampling strategies in improving access to preventive healthcare services and promoting screening participation. Therefore, this study aimed to explore in depth the experiences and perspectives of women who participated in a nurse navigation program regarding cervical cancer screening. Methods This thematic qualitative study was conducted in Istanbul, Türkiye, with women who had participated in a nurse navigation program and undergone cervical cancer screening. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews and analysed using thematic analysis. The reporting of the study was guided by the COREQ checklist. Results Twelve women participated in the study. The findings demonstrated that the nurse navigation program improved women’s knowledge and awareness regarding HPV, cervical cancer, and screening. However, psychosocial barriers such as fear, shame, embarrassment, and avoidance of hospital environments continued to influence screening behavior. Participants generally expressed positive attitudes toward HPV self-sampling, media-based awareness strategies, and artificial intelligence–supported health information systems. Individual health perceptions, social support, and health system-related factors were also found to shape women’s participation in screening programs. Conclusion The findings suggested that participants perceived the nurse navigation program as contributing to increased knowledge and awareness regarding HPV, cervical cancer, and screening. Nurse navigation programs may contribute to improving screening participation by providing education, guidance, and supportive communication. Multidimensional and community-based approaches addressing both individual and structural barriers may enhance participation in cervical cancer screening programs
Cancer screening · Cervical cancer · Cervical cancer screening · Health care · Psychosocial · Qualitative research · Thematic analysis · Cervical Cancer and HPV Research · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Reproductive tract infections research
Global cancer statistics 2022
Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018
Systematic methodological review
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (Coreq)
Global Cancer Statistics 2020
Factors influencing the participation of groups identified as underserved in cervical cancer screening in Europe
HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening
Integration of cervical cancer screening into healthcare facilities in low- and middle-income countries
Barriers to cervical cancer and breast cancer screening uptake in low- and middle-income countries
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Naturalistic inquiry
Factors influencing the decision to undergo cervical cancer screening tests (Pap Smear and HPV-DNA testing) in women aged 30-65
How Many Interviews Are Enough
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |