Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Prediction of injury risk in Chinese mine rescuers based on single factors and different threshold combinations of FMS and YBT

Bibliographic Data

ID22089193
AuthorsGuanghao Yang (0009-0007-7687-7254, China University of Mining and Technology), Di Gao (0000-0002-3596-1456, China University of Mining and Technology), Sanjun Yang (0000-0001-6443-5001, China University of Mining and Technology, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume13
Pages1586179-1586179
Publication date2025-12-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2025.1586179
PMID41473719
OpenAlexW4417168462
LanguageEN
References cited15

Purpose This study aims to investigate the correlation between FMS and YBT indicators with injuries and to explore a single predictive threshold or combinations of thresholds for practical reference. Methods Injury histories of 96 Datong rescue team members were collected via questionnaire, and multiple FMS and YBT indicators were assessed at the same site on different occasions. Data were organized and categorized using Excel and SPSS 29.0. Threshold values derived from relevant literature on comparable occupational groups adopted as reference standards, and statistical analyses (t-test, chi-square) were applied to examine the associations between functional indicators and injury, and to evaluate the validity of both individual and combined threshold criteria. Results (1) Injuries primarily concentrated in the lumbar and knee regions, accounting for approximately 50% of total injuries. (2) There were highly significant differences between injured and uninjured groups in FMS scores and YBT bilateral reach distance difference ( p 4 cm. (4) When combining the criteria of FMS overall score 4 cm, the injury rate increased to 90.38%. Conclusion (1) The threshold values for the overall scores of FMS and YBT can effectively predict injury risk. In contrast, the YBT bilateral reach distance difference demonstrates superior advantages. (2) The accuracy of combined predictions is higher, with the combination of an FMS 15 and YBT bilateral difference of 4 cm serving as the optimal standard

Poison control · Risk assessment · Significant difference · Subway station · Injury Epidemiology and Prevention · Occupational Health and Performance · Trauma and Emergency Care Studies

  • Isokinetic Strength, Vertical Jump Performance, and Strength Differences in First Line Professional Firefighters Competing in Fire Sport

    Open Access•Petr Miřátský, Tomáš Gryc et al.•International Journal of…•2021

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae